Cited by 52Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Improving the use of LLMs in radiology through prompt engineering: from precision prompts to zero-shot learning

Open access
Russe, Maximilian Frederik, Reisert, Marco, Bamberg, Fabian, Rau, Alexander·2024·RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren

Abstract

PURPOSE: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have shown significant potential in radiology. Their effectiveness often depends on prompt engineering, which optimizes the interaction with the chatbot for accurate results. Here, we highlight the critical role of prompt engineering in tailoring the LLMs' responses to specific medical tasks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a clinical case, we elucidate different prompting strategies to adapt the LLM ChatGPT using GPT4 to new tasks without additional training of the base model. These approaches range from precision prompts to advanced in-context methods such as few-shot and zero-shot learning. Additionally, the significance of embeddings, which serve as a data representation technique, is discussed. RESULTS: Prompt engineering substantially improved and focused the chatbot's output. Moreover, embedding of specialized knowledge allows for more transparent insight into the model's decision-making and thus enhances trust. CONCLUSION: Despite certain challenges, prompt engineering plays a pivotal role in harnessing the potential of LLMs for specialized tasks in the medical domain, particularly radiology. As LLMs continue to evolve, techniques like few-shot learning, zero-shot learning, and embedding-based retrieval mechanisms will become indispensable in delivering tailored outputs. KEY POINTS: · Large language models might impact radiological practice and decision-masking.. · However, implementation and performance are dependent on the assigned task.. · Optimization of prompting strategies can substantially improve model performance.. · Strategies for prompt engineering range from precision prompts to zero-shot learning.. CITATION FORMAT: · Russe MF, Reisert M, Bamberg F et al. Improving the use of LLMs in radiology through prompt engineering: from precision prompts to zero-shot learning . Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 1166 - 1170.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2264-5631

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russe, M. F., Reisert, M., Bamberg, F., & Rau, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Rau, Alexander
Venue
RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
Published
2024-02-26
Volume
196
Issue
11
Pages
1166-1170
ISSN
  • 1438-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-9029
OpenAlex
W4392151399
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, prompt engineering, radiology, ChatGPT, zero-shot learning, few-shot learning, embeddings, in-context learning, model interpretability, clinical decision support, artificial intelligence in radiology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review