Cited by 32Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Weight loss and mortality in persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the epidemiological evidence

Williamson, D. F.·2009·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

Six epidemiological studies of weight loss and mortality in persons with diabetes are reviewed in this paper. One study found no relationship between weight loss and mortality, one study (published as an abstract) found that weight loss was associated with reduced mortality, and in two studies the results were mixed: in some groups weight loss was associated with increased mortality and in other subgroups weight loss was associated with reduced mortality. The most appropriate interpretation from this group of studies is that the relationship between weight loss and mortality in persons with diabetes is equivocal. None of these studies were designed to experimentally test the hypothesis that intentional weight loss increases survival in persons with diabetes. Because weight loss was not randomly assigned to the study participants, and because the reasons that the participants lost weight are not made clear, we can only conjecture about the potential confounding role that underlying illness plays in accounting for these results. In addition, the epidemiological evidence suggests that persons with diabetes are more likely than non-diabetics to experience both intentional and unintentional weight loss. This fact makes it especially difficult to cleanly separate the potentially opposing effects of intentional and unintentional weight loss in observational studies. Because of the important limitations and inconsistencies in the results of the studies reviewed here, the clinical com…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0029-1212031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological studies in individuals with diabetes provide conflicting results, perhaps due to confounding from unintentional weight loss.

    “Epidemiological studies in individuals with diabetes provide conflicting results, perhaps due to confounding from unintentional weight loss.3”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, D. F.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Williamson, D. F.
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2009-07-14
Volume
106
Issue
S 02
Pages
14-21
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W2049202334
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
weight loss, type 2 diabetes, mortality, intentional weight loss, unintentional weight loss, survival, observational studies, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Weight Loss, Epidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review