Cited by 9Health Policy Implementation ScienceMedical Practices and RehabilitationPsychiatric care and mental health services

Implementierung eines psychodiagnostischen Stufenplans in der medizinischen Rehabilitation – Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie

Vogel, B., Jahed, J., Bengel, J., Barth, J., Härter, M., Baumeister, H.·2009·Die Rehabilitation

Abstract

STUDY AIM: A pilot study was conducted to implement and evaluate a routine gradual psycho-diagnostic programme to improve diagnostics and treatment of mental disorders in somatic rehabilitation centres. First of all, implementation strategies were acquired in trainings together with psychologists and physicians. The psycho-diagnostic programme consists of a screening instrument (PHQ-9) designed to permit time-effective detection of comorbid mental disorders. Besides evaluation of the training, the aim of the study was to analyze the extent to which it is possible to implement the routine gradual psycho-diagnostic programme in practice. Additionally, it was intended to identify beneficial and obstructive conditions for implementation. METHODOLOGY: The pilot study was conducted in two orthopaedic and one cardiological rehabilitation centre. The training was evaluated directly after its completion using a questionnaire. Three months after its implementation, the introduction of the psycho-diagnostic programme was evaluated using interviews with n=11 physicians and psychologists. RESULTS: The training was rated positively by the participants . Implementation of the entire gradual psycho-diagnostic programme was possible in one centre and to some degree in the other two. Beneficial for implementation were a frank organisational climate, sufficient time resources, and physicians' biopsychosocial understanding of disease. A dismissive attitude towards psycho-diagnostics, little communication between staff members, little perceived advantage for one's own work and fear to stigmatise patients by psychiatric diagnoses were obstructive. CONCLUSION: Essential for a successful implementation are sufficient time and personal resources, a motivation for change in staff and centre management, and a positive attitude regarding psycho-diagnostics in clinic staff. Furthermore, flexibility in implementation strategies and the opportunity to participate in the implementation process are important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0029-1241810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogel, B., Jahed, J., Bengel, J., Barth, J., Härter, M., & Baumeister, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
Die Rehabilitation
Published
2009-12
Volume
48
Issue
06
Pages
361-368
ISSN
  • 0034-3536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1309
OpenAlex
W2803292299
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Die Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
medical rehabilitation, PHQ-9 screening, implementation barriers and facilitators, employee training, organizational climate, biopsychosocial model, orthopedic rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Cooperative Behavior, Germany, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Inservice Training, Interview, Psychological, Motivation, Patient Care Team, Pilot Projects, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Rehabilitation Centers, Somatoform Disorders, Program Evaluation, Comorbidity, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review