Cited by 33Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite (IWQOL-lite) questionnaire

Mueller, A., Holzapfel, C., Hauner, H., Crosby, R. D., Engel, S. G., Mühlhans, B., Kolotkin, R. L., Mitchell, J. E. +2 more·2010·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a German version of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) questionnaire. METHOD: IWQOL-Lite scores were obtained from 351 overweight/obese individuals and 127 lean adult volunteers. In addition, a subgroup of 126 obese subjects completed also the German versions of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), and the German validated version of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ). RESULTS: The German version of the IWQOL-Lite has psychometric properties comparable to those found for the original version and demonstrates high internal consistency and excellent construct validity. Furthermore, the German IWQOL-Lite clearly discriminates between groups based on BMI on all subscales and the total score. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that the German IWQOL-Lite is a psychometrically validated instrument with which to measure weight-specific health related quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0030-1261922

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, A., Holzapfel, C., Hauner, H., Crosby, R. D., Engel, S. G., Mühlhans, B., Kolotkin, R. L., Mitchell, J. E., Horbach, T., & Zwaan, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Stadtkrankenhaus Schwabach (DE)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2010-07-23
Volume
119
Issue
02
Pages
69-74
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W2005085367
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
IWQOL-Lite, weight-related quality of life, obesity, overweight, German translation, psychometric validation, construct validity, internal consistency, body mass index, health-related quality of life, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Female, Germany, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review