Cited by 25Spinal Dysraphism and MalformationsEpilepsy research and treatmentFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The relationship of seizure activity and chronic epilepsy in early infancy and short-term neurodevelopmental outcome following fetal myelomeningocele closure

Danzer, E., Finkel, R., Gerdes, M., Schwartz, E. M. S., Rintoul, N., Adzick, N., Johnson, M.·2010·Neuropediatrics

Abstract

We explored the relationship between seizure activity (SA) and/or chronic epilepsy (CE) and short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes following fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) surgery. Retrospective databases and a parental questionnaire focusing on common complications of hindbrain herniation associated with MMC were used to determine the incidence of seizures following fMMC surgery. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development II was used to evaluate the neurocognitive outcomes. The available 3-year outcome data were used for analysis. 54 children underwent fMMC closure at our institution between 1998 and 2003. 48 (89%) families participated. The shunt rate was 50% (n=24). Seizures developed in 8/48 (17%) children, 2 (8%) non-shunted and 6 (25%) shunted (P=0.07). Of those six, 3 developed CE. Neurodevelopmental scores in the average range were found in both non-shunted and 3 shunted fMMC children. The remaining 3 shunted toddlers had CE and significant neurodevelopmental delays. Of those, 2 had severe intracranial hemorrhage and one developed frequent apneic spells in combination with epilepsy. The incidence of seizures in fMMC children was similar to previously reported data of postnatally repaired MMC patients. SA alone without CE was not associated with a worse neurocognitive outcome. The occurrence of severe acquired intracranial injury and CE, however, appeared to be correlated with adverse neurocognitive outcome following fMMC surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0030-1263164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danzer, E., Finkel, R., Gerdes, M., Schwartz, E. M. S., Rintoul, N., Adzick, N., & Johnson, M.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Venue
Neuropediatrics
Published
2010-06
Volume
41
Issue
03
Pages
140-143
ISSN
  • 0174-304X (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1899
OpenAlex
W1994753922
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
fetal surgery, seizure activity, chronic epilepsy, neurodevelopmental outcomes, neuropsychological outcomes, shunt, intracranial hemorrhage, apnea, hindbrain herniation, early infancy
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Epilepsy, Female, Fetal Diseases, Humans, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Meningomyelocele, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Seizures, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review