The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss to follow-up
Open accessAbstract
In this issue, we answer three questions with respect to loss to follow-up in a clinical trial: How important is loss to follow-up? How is loss to follow-up calculated? How many patients can be lost to follow-up without mistrusting the results? 1. How important is loss to follow-up? The simple answer to this question is „very important” because loss to follow-up can severely compromise a study’s validity. Incomplete follow-up biases the results when either: The dropout rates are different between study groups; or The patients who drop out are different from those who do not drop out. Why do these situations make a difference? Because in each situation, those lost to follow-up often have a different prognosis than those who complete the study. For example, patients who receive treatment for cervical myelopathy may not return for follow-up because they became asymptomatic and felt no need to return to see the surgeon. Conversely, some patients may not return because they had a particularly bad outcome (worse pain or function) or complication, or because they died. In either case, bias can affect the validity of the inferences drawn from the study. 2. How is loss to follow-up calculated? There is much confusion about how to determine the proportion of patients lost to follow-up. In order to correctly calculate the follow-up rate, one needs to know the denominator. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the denominator for each group is the number of patients who were randomized, not the number who received the treatment. For example, suppose we have an RCT comparing two treatment groups, Group A and Group B. The investigators evaluate 178 patients and randomize 120; 61 to Group A and 59 to Group B (Fig 1). Following the figure, we note that 49 patients received treatment A and 52 received treatment B. At the final follow-up 40 were analyzed in Group A and 41 in Group B. How many were considered lost to follow-up? Many would consider the loss to follow-up rate to be 9 (18 %) of 49 in treatment A and 11 (21 %) of 52 in treatment B using as the denominator only those that were treated. However, the real proportion lost to follow-up must consider those who were randomly assigned, even if they did not receive treatment. In the present example, this is calculated as 21 (34 %) of 61 for treatment A and 18 (31 %) of 59 for treatment B.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The minimum sample size for each group was identified as 26 (78 in total), but at least an additional 20% will be recruited to take into account expected follow-up attrition; thus, a minimum total sample of 96 participants (32 per group) is estimated.15 34”
From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User’s Guide to the Orthopaedic Literature: How to Use an Article About a Surgical Therapy
Bhandari, M., Guyatt, G., & Swiontkowski, M. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200106000-00015 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 336
Hahn, D., Cody, J. D., & Hodson, E. M. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003895.pub3 · Cited by 20
Antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-positive people
Aves, T., Tambe, J., Siemieniuk, R. A. C., & Mbuagbaw, L. C. E. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006495.pub5 · Cited by 18
Pal, A., Paul, S., Perry, R. E., & Puryer, J. (2019) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj7040108 · Cited by 18
Prognostic predictors of remission in ocular myasthenia after thymectomy
Liu, X., Zhou, W., Hu, J., Hu, M., Gao, W., Zhang, S., & Zeng, W. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2020.01.17 · Cited by 18
Kunze, K. N., Burnett, R. A., Lee, E. K., Rasio, J. P., & Nho, S. J. (2020) · Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2020.07.007 · Cited by 17
Ng, R., El‐Den, S., Collins, J. C., Hu, J., McMillan, S. S., Wheeler, A., & O’Reilly, C. L. (2023) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1016/j.japh.2023.01.007 · Cited by 18
Horsager, K., Madsen, F., Odgaard, A., Jepsen, C. F., Rømer, L., Kristensen, P. W., Kaptein, B. L., Søballé, K., & Stilling, M. (2018) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453674.2018.1543757 · Cited by 18
Cai, H., Liang, X., Sun, D., & Chen, J. (2020) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1087 · Cited by 18
Bose, D., Saha, S., Saxena, U., Kesari, H. V., Thatte, U. M., & Gogtay, N. J. (2020) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/picr.picr_198_18 · Cited by 17
Emami, E., Lavigne, G. J., Feine, J. S., Karp, I., Rompre, P. H., Almeida, F. R., & Huynh, N. T. (2021) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab101 · Cited by 17
Prenatal exposure to benzodiazepines and the development of the offspring – a systematic review
Jensen, A. G., Knudsen, S. S., & Bech, B. H. (2022) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2022.107078 · Cited by 17
How much is the lack of retention evidence costing trial teams in Ireland and the UK?
Murphy, E., Shiely, F., & Treweek, S. P. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06223-x · Cited by 16
Adogwa, O., Karikari, I. O., Elsamadicy, A. A., Sergesketter, A. R., Galán, D., & Bridwell, K. H. (2018) · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine · doi:10.3171/2018.2.spine171142 · Cited by 17
Long‐Term Outcomes of Septoplasty With or Without Turbinoplasty: A Systematic Review
Fearington, F. W., Awadallah, A. S., Hamilton, G. S., Olson, M. D., & Dey, J. K. (2023) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.31193 · Cited by 19
Judit Szigeti, F., Kazinczi, C., Szabó, G., Sipos, M., Ujma, P. P., & Purebl, G. (2024) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae119 · Cited by 16
Magsino, K., Sanjanwala, R., Hiebert, B. M., Rothney, J., Manji, R. A., Arora, R. C., & Shah, P. J. (2018) · The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1618578 · Cited by 16
Uusküla, A., Laisaar, K., Raag, M., Lemsalu, L., Lõhmus, L., Rüütel, K., Amico, K. R., Zilmer, K., Aug, T., Kase, K., et al. (2017) · Aids and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1859-6 · Cited by 16
In-hospital growth and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants
Consales, A., Porro, M., Gangi, S., Pesenti, N., Gardon, L., Squarza, C., Frigerio, A., Lezzi, I., Vizzari, G., Morniroli, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1180068 · Cited by 15
Pattanasin, S., Wimonsate, W., Chonwattana, W., Tongtoyai, J., Chaikummao, S., Sriporn, A., Sukwicha, W., Mock, P. A., & Holtz, T. H. (2015) · International Journal of STD & AIDS · doi:10.1177/0956462415578954 · Cited by 15
Gupte, G., Peters, C. M., Buchowski, J. M., & Zebala, L. P. (2019) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.03.002 · Cited by 15
Overminus Lens Therapy in the Management of Children with Intermittent Exotropia
Aghdam, K. A., Zand, A., Sanjari, M. S., Khorramdel, S., & Asadi, R. (2021) · Journal of Current Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/joco.joco_17_20 · Cited by 14
Ambrosio, L., Petrucci, G., Russo, F., Cicione, C., Papalia, R., Vadalà, G., & Denaro, V. (2024) · JOR Spine · doi:10.1002/jsp2.1329 · Cited by 14
“59 Among published trials from our search, loss to follow-up rates ranged from 9% 42 to 27%, 46 therefore posing a substantial risk of bias.”
Changes in physical activity behavior and development of cardiovascular risk in children
Lona, G., Hauser, C., Köchli, S., Infanger, D., Endes, K., Faude, O., & Hanssen, H. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13931 · Cited by 16
Butler, A. E., Battista, K., Leatherdale, S. T., Meyer, S. B., Elliott, S. J., & Majowicz, S. E. (2021) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1922804 · Cited by 14
Toci, G. R., Canseco, J. A., Karamian, B. A., Chang, M. P., Grasso, G., Nicholson, K. J., Pflug, E. M., Russo, G. S., Tarazona, D. A., Kaye, I. D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine · doi:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_165_21 · Cited by 14
de Assis, P., Silva, C., Nascimento, A., Anníbal, H., Júnior, S. P. D. A., Soares, N., Júnior, R. M. M., & Braz, R. (2023) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/22-067-lit · Cited by 14
Lindman, I., Olsson, H., Öhlin, A., Senorski, E. H., Stålman, A., Ayeni, O. R., & Sansone, M. (2020) · Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaa028 · Cited by 14
Artese, A., Winthrop, H. M., Bohannon, L. M., Lew, M., Johnson, E. J., MacDonald, G. A., Ren, Y., Pastva, A. M., Hall, K. S. M., Wischmeyer, P. E., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293171 · Cited by 11
Milner, K. A. (2014) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/15.onf.89-93 · Cited by 18
Real-world adherence to topical therapies in patients with moderate acne
Hoai, X. L., Maertelaer, V. D., & Simonart, T. (2021) · JAAD International · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2020.12.006 · Cited by 12
Li, X., Keown‐Stoneman, C. D. G., Borkhoff, C. M., Wong, P. D., Arafeh, D., Tavares, E. S., Thadani, S., Maguire, J. L., & Birken, C. S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284192 · Cited by 12
Relationship between herpesviruses and periodontal disease progression
Emecen‐Huja, P., Danaher, R. J., Dawson, D. R., Wang, C., Kryscio, R. J., Ebersole, J. L., & Miller, C. S. (2019) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13239 · Cited by 12
Study adherence in a tDCS longitudinal clinical trial with people with spinal cord injury
Carvalho, S., Leite, J., Jones, F. J. S., Morse, L. R., ZAFONTE, R. D., & Fregni, F. (2017) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/s41393-017-0023-5 · Cited by 12
Fu, J.-J., Min, J., Yu, P.-M., McDonald, V., & Mao, B. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011297 · Cited by 9
Yasunaga, Y., Oshima, S., Shoji, T., Adachi, N., & Ochi, M. (2024) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0818.r1 · Cited by 11
Zhang, J. K., Javeed, S., Greenberg, J. K., Yakdan, S. M., Kaleem, M. I., Botterbush, K. S., Benedict, B. C., Dibble, C. F., Sun, P., Sherrod, B. A., et al. (2024) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003037 · Cited by 11
Bumpass, D. B., Lenke, L. G., Gum, J. L., Shaffrey, C. I., Smith, J. S., Ames, C. P., Bess, S. R., Neuman, B. J., Klineberg, E. O., Mundis, G. M., et al. (2017) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2017.9.focus17475 · Cited by 11
Rostron, Z. P. J., Green, R. A., Kingsley, M., & Zacharias, A. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121251 · Cited by 11
Western, B., Ivarsson, A., Vistad, I., Demmelmaier, I., Aaronson, N. K., Radcliffe, G., van Beurden, M., Bohus, M., Courneya, K. S., Daley, A., et al. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.14575 · Cited by 11
“14,15 However, sample sizes of individual studies are often too small to identify associations with study dropout and rarely allow for comparisons of different exercise programs.”
Prospective Cohort Studies in Medical Research
Hammoudeh, S., Gadelhaq, W., & Janahi, I. A. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.76514 · Cited by 12
Kiabi, F. H., Soleimani, A., & Habibi, M. R. (2019) · Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0263 · Cited by 11
Sindhu, K. N., Srinivasan, M., Subramaniam, S., David, A. S., Mohan, V. R., John, J. K., & Kang, G. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0881-y · Cited by 11
Meyer, S. R., Rege, S., Avalaskar, P., Deosthali, P., García‐Moreno, C., & Amin, A. (2020) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-020-00609-x · Cited by 11
Duong, D. T. T., Pham, N. M., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhao, Y., Dinh, T. P. H., & Ha, B. T. T. (2022) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2022.0088 · Cited by 11
Chattopadhyay, K., Mishra, P., Singh, K., Harris, T. J., Hamer, M., Greenfield, S., Lewis, S., Manjunath, N. K., Nair, R., Mukherjee, S., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036277 · Cited by 11
D’Ambrosi, R., Tiusanen, H., Ellington, J. K., Kraus, F., Younger, A. S. E., & Usuelli, F. G. (2022) · JBJS Open Access · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00143 · Cited by 10
Cao, C., Wang, T. B., Hu, H., Han, Y. Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03581-8 · Cited by 10
“Previous studies have shown that a loss to follow-up rate of 5% or less usually results in a small bias [34].”
von Allmen, R. S., Tinner, C., Schmidli, J., Tevaearai, H. T., & Dick, F. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213822 · Cited by 10
“As a rule of thumb it is considered that < 5% loss of patients during follow up leads to little bias, while > 20% poses serious threats to validity, with even less than 20% of incomplete follow up data being a problem [10].”
Novel diagnostic potential of miR-1 in patients with acute heart failure
Sadat‐Ebrahimi, S., Rezabakhsh, A., Aslanabadi, N., Asadi, M., Zafari, V., Shanebandi, D., Zarredar, H., Enamzadeh, E., Taghizadeh, H., & Badalzadeh, R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275019 · Cited by 11
The natural history of ALS: Baseline characteristics from a multicenter clinical cohort
Berger, A., Locatelli, M., Arcila-Londono, X., Hayat, G. R., Olney, N. T., Wymer, J. P., Gwathmey, K. G., Lunetta, C., Heiman-Patterson, T. D., Ajroud‐Driss, S., et al. (2023) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.1080/21678421.2023.2232812 · Cited by 10
“This issue, if not handled by the statistical analysis, can lead to incorrect estimation of time-to-event or survival, which could hinder the validity of any conclusion drawn from the dataset (21).”
Photodynamic Therapy in Non-Gastrointestinal Thoracic Malignancies
Kidane, B., Hirpara, D. H., & Yasufuku, K. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17010135 · Cited by 10
Mukhtar, F., & Butt, Z. A. (2017) · Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.jegh.2017.08.003 · Cited by 10
Yasunaga, Y., Tanaka, R., Mifuji, K., Shoji, T., Yamasaki, T., Adachi, N., & Ochi, M. (2019) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.101b4.bjj-2018-1200.r1 · Cited by 10
Masamu, U., Sangeda, R. Z., Kandonga, D., Ondengo, J., Ndobho, F., Mmbando, B. P., Nkya, S. W., Msami, K., & Makani, J. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05998-6 · Cited by 10
Cockburn, E., Janovec, J., Solano, M. A., & L’Eplattenier, H. (2022) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.21.05.0235 · Cited by 10
Assessing the Effects of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy in Patients Lost to Follow-up
Han, J. J., Lee, J. H., Oh, S. H., Chang, S. O., & Suh, M. (2015) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000000716 · Cited by 10
Efficacy and Safety of Induction Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer with Airway Involvement
Noronha, V., Joshi, A., Patil, V. M., Purandare, N. C., Jiwnani, S. S., Laskar, S. G., Nakti, D., Bandekar, B., & Prabhash, K. (2016) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12029-016-9830-8 · Cited by 9
Fidalgo, T. M., Sanchez, Z. M., Ribeiro, M. V. V., Healy, S. R., Caetano, S. C., & Martins, S. S. (2017) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1436-6 · Cited by 9
Health Outcome Prioritization in Alzheimer’s Disease: Understanding the Ethical Landscape
McKeown, A., Turner, A. J., Angehrn, Z., Gove, D., Ly, A., Nordon, C., Nelson, M., Tochel, C., Mittelstadt, B., Keenan, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-191300 · Cited by 12
Mac‐Thiong, J., Richard‐Denis, A., Petit, Y., Bernard, F., Barthélemy, D., Dionne, A., & Magnuson, D. S. K. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049884 · Cited by 10
Toyama, N., Taniguchi-Tabata, A., Sawada, N., Sugiura, Y., Fukuhara, D., Uchida, Y., Miyai, H., Yokoi, A., Mizutani, S., Ekuni, D., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15122630 · Cited by 9
Bissonnette, S., & Boyer, C. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12557 · Cited by 9
Ye, Z., Zeng, G., Chen, Z., & Xu, H. (2018) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.033 · Cited by 9
What it takes to recruit 77 subjects for a one‐year study on active commuting
de Battre, M. D. F. L. P., Neumeier, L., Ensslin, C., Loidl, M., Gräni, C., Schmied, C. M., Reich, B., Niebauer, J., & Niederseer, D. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13682 · Cited by 9
Pitt, T. M., Hetherington, E., Adhikari, K., Premji, S., Racine, N. M., Tough, S., & McDonald, S. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02121-1 · Cited by 8
“While attrition over time is expected, it can contribute to biased exposure-outcome relationships depending on the nature of how and/or why individuals drop out of the study [3].”
Lightfoot, C. J., Wilkinson, T. J., Vadaszy, N., Graham-Brown, M. P. M., Davies, M. J., Yates, T. E., & Smith, A. C. (2024) · Journal of Renal Care · doi:10.1111/jorc.12488 · Cited by 8
A Scoping Review of Trauma, Mental Health and First Responders in Australia
Jones, R., Jackson, D. W., Ranse, J., Arena, A. F. A., Clegg, L., Sutton, C., Gayed, A., Rice, K., & Usher, K. J. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13397 · Cited by 10
Farrell, K., Griffiths, R., & Fernandez, R. S. (2014) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1077 · Cited by 8
Phyo, A. Z. Z., González‐Chica, D. A., Stocks, N. P., Woods, R. L., Tran, T. D., Reid, C. M., Tonkin, A. M., Nelson, M. R., McNeil, J. J., Murray, A. M., et al. (2022) · American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100117 · Cited by 9
Charlson comorbidity index applied to shunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Klinge, P. M., Ma, K. L., Leary, O. P., Sastry, R. A., Sayied, S., Venegas, O. G., Brinker, T., & Gokaslan, Z. L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32088-4 · Cited by 8
Zdziarski-Horodyski, L., Vasilopoulos, T., Horodyski, M., Hagen, J. E., Sadasivan, K., Sharififar, S., Patrick, M., Guenther, R. T., & Vincent, H. K. (2020) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001140 · Cited by 8
Saad, M. F. B., Cheah, W. L., & Hazmi, H. (2021) · Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.3961/jpmph.20.584 · Cited by 8
Bastos, E. L. D. S., Salgado, W., Dantas, A. C. B., Onzi, T. R., Silva, L. B., Albano, A., Tristão, L. S., dos Santos, C. L., Bernardo, W. M., & Silvinato, A. (2024) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-024-07206-4 · Cited by 9
Paediatric surgical services in remote northern Australia: an integrated model of care
Quinn, L., & Read, D. J. (2017) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.14116 · Cited by 8
Antonopoulos, D., Mavrogenis, A. F., Megaloikonomos, P. D., Mitsiokapa, E. A., Georgoudis, G., Vottis, C. T., Antonopoulos, G. K., Papagelopoulos, P. J., Pneumatikos, S., & Spyridonos, S. G. (2017) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.008 · Cited by 8
Villarreal‐Espinosa, J. B., Khan, Z. A., Jan, K., Berreta, R. S., Murray, M. J., Allende, F., Nho, S. J., & Chahla, J. A. (2025) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465241283967 · Cited by 7
“Other studies investigating Achilles tendinopathy-and scoliosis-related RCTs 12,37 found CFIs of 5 and 6, respectively.”
Tshivhase, S., Khoza, L. B., & Tshitangano, T. G. (2020) · African vision and eye health · doi:10.4102/aveh.v79i1.559 · Cited by 7
Predicting Patient Loss to Follow-up in the STABILITY 1 Study
Firth, A., Bryant, D., Johnson, A. M., Getgood, A. M. J., & the STABILITY 1 Study Group (2022) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.20.02117 · Cited by 7
Fahim, C., Hylton, D. A., Simunovic, M. R. I., Agzarian, J., Finley, C., Hanna, W. C., & Shargall, Y. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3536-8 · Cited by 8
Jurcău, A., & Nunkoo, V. S. (2021) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/15333175211021369 · Cited by 9
“Nonetheless, the baseline characteristics of these patients did not differing significantly from those of patients who completed the study and they were less than 20% of the whole group, which is why we still consider our results to be reliable.(37)”
Szachnowicz, S., Duarte, A. F., Nasi, A., Rocha, J. R. M., Seguro, F. S., Bianchi, E. T., Tustumi, F., de Moura, E. G. H., Sallum, R. A. A., & Cecconello, I. (2022) · Diseases of the Esophagus · doi:10.1093/dote/doac026 · Cited by 7
Rafiei, M., Das, S., Bakhtiari, M., Roos, E. M., Skou, S. T., Grønne, D. T., Baumbach, J., & Baumbach, L. (2025) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/60162 · Cited by 6
“However, we only excluded 28.44% due to missing information on the outcome at follow-up, suggesting no serious threats to its external validity [47].”
InfluentialLee, Y. T., Akan, A., Önel, D. B., Medawar, E., Jensen, D. E. A., Villringer, A., & Witte, A. V. (2025) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.70037 · Cited by 8
Den Patienten wirklich verstehen lernen: Real-world-Evidenz aus der „patient journey“
Zyumbileva, P., Uebe, M., Rudolph, S., & Kalle, C. V. (2022) · Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung · doi:10.1007/s11553-022-00984-8 · Cited by 6
Cancer Currencies: Making and Marketing Resources in a First-in-Human Drug Trial in Denmark
Hillersdal, L., & Svendsen, M. N. (2022) · Human perspectives in health sciences and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92612-0_4 · Cited by 6
Noronha, V., Chougule, A., Chandrani, P., Kumar, R., Patil, V., Menon, N. S., Kapoor, A., Chopade, S. R., Singh, A. K., Shetty, O. A., et al. (2022) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2022.2109426 · Cited by 6
Sivakumar, I., Sivakumar, A., Buzayan, M. M., & Sharan, J. (2022) · Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.11.002 · Cited by 6
Cao, H., Lian, H.-W., Yan, E., Duan, R., Zhou, J., Chen, X., & Jiang, T. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13010020 · Cited by 6
Shipton, E. V., Foxcroft, K., Nitert, M. D., McIntyre, D. H., Barrett, H. L., Tang, M. L. K., & Callaway, L. K. (2023) · International Archives of Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1159/000535179 · Cited by 11
Metse, A. P., Hizam, N. A. N., Wiggers, J. H., Wye, P. M., & Bowman, J. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0640-5 · Cited by 6
Gamma knife radiosurgery for high-risk lactotroph adenomas: Long-term results
Kara, M., Samancı, Y., Yılmaz, M., Şengöz, M., & Peker, S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.025 · Cited by 6
Editorial Commentary: Outcomes Reporting in Value‐Based Care: It's Complicated
Verma, N. N. (2018) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.037 · Cited by 6
Clark, D. S., Tingey, B., Shi, J. L., & Somerson, J. S. (2025) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465241302797 · Cited by 5
Mikula-Noble, N., Cormie, V., McCowan, R., & McCowan, C. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329794 · Cited by 5
“For the small amount of papers that did involve follow-ups, many of the papers had more than 20% loss to follow-up, which is considered a serious threat to validity [26], and therefore stars could not be allocated for those papers in section 3.3 of the scale.”
InfluentialLoss to Follow-up: A Deceptive Enigma
Patel, S., Kumar, V., Khan, S., & Salaria, A. K. (2021) · Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India) · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1728971 · Cited by 5
Matrood, S., Melms, L., Bartsch, D. K., & Fazio, P. D. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24043636 · Cited by 5
Metastatin as a Marker for Hyperandrogenemia in Iraqi Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Abdalqader, M. M., & Hussein, S. S. (2020) · Obstetrics and Gynecology International · doi:10.1155/2020/5216903 · Cited by 5
“Since both were less than 20% (which is considered significant bias), the authors did not consider this lost to follow-up because it would create significant bias [13].”
Effect of Preoperative Opiate Use on Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Surgery
Mierke, A., Ramos, O., Chung, J. H., Cheng, W. K., & Danisa, O. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.22663 · Cited by 5
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from human chromosome 11
Liehr, T., Ziegler, M., Person, L., Kankel, S., Padutsch, N., Weise, A., Weimer, J. P., Williams, H. E., Ferreira, S. I., Melo, J. B., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1293652 · Cited by 5
Ueyama, H., Minoda, Y., Sugama, R., Ohta, Y., Nakamura, S., Takemura, S., & Nakamura, H. (2020) · The Knee · doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.04.011 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Dettori, J.
- Affiliations
- Spectrum Research (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dettori, Joseph
- ORCID
- Dettori, Joseph
- Venue
- Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 7-10
- ISSN
- 1663-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-4136
- PMC
- PMC3427970
- OpenAlex
- W1965730835
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- loss to follow-up, dropout, randomized controlled trials, research validity, bias, cervical myelopathy, spinal surgery outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review