Cited by 64Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports injuries and prevention

High-Intensity Re-Warm-Ups Enhance Soccer Performance

Zois, J., Bishop, D., Fairweather, I., Ball, K., Aughey, R.·2013·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The effects of high-intensity, short-duration, re-warm-ups on team-sport-related performance were investigated. In a randomised, cross-over study, participants performed 2×26-min periods of an intermittent activity protocol (IAP) on a non-motorized treadmill, interspersed by 15-min of passive recovery (CON); 3-min small-sided game (SSG); or a 5RM leg-press. Measures included counter-movement jump, repeated-sprint, the Loughborough soccer passing test (LSPT), blood lactate concentration, heart-rate, and perceptual measures. Data were analyzed using effect size (90% confidence intervals), and percentage change; determining magnitudes of effects. A 5RM re-warm-up improved flight-time to contraction-time ratio when compared to SSG (9.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3) and CON (ES: 9.4%, 0.7±0.5) re-warm-ups, remaining higher following the second IAP (8.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3 and 10.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6, respectively). Relative-maximum rate-of-force development was greater in the 5RM condition following the second IAP compared to SSG (29.3%, ES; 0.7±0.5) and CON (16.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6). Repeated-sprint ability during the second IAP improved in the 5RM re-warm-up; peak velocity, mean velocity, and acceleration were 4, 3, and 18% greater, respectively. Within groups, the SSG re-warm-up improved LSPT performance post-intervention; 6.4% (ES: 0.6±0.8) and following the second IAP 6.2% (ES: 0.6±0.6), compared to pre-intervention. A 5RM leg-press re-warm-up improved physical performance, while a SSG re-warm-up enhanced skill execution following standardized intermittent exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0032-1331197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zois, J., Bishop, D., Fairweather, I., Ball, K., & Aughey, R.
Affiliations
Victoria University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
34
Issue
09
Pages
800-805
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W1984036179
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
soccer performance, small-sided games, repeated sprint ability, rate of force development, countermovement jump, Loughborough Soccer Passing Test, blood lactate, heart rate, skill execution, team sports
MeSH terms
Adult, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Running, Soccer, Cross-Over Studies, Lactic Acid, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Warm-Up Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review