Cited by 103Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesHip disorders and treatments

Hip and knee kinematics are associated with pain and self-reported functional status in males and females with patellofemoral pain

Nakagawa, T., Serrão, F., Maciel, C., Powers, C.·2013·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Altered hip and knee kinematics in the frontal and transverse planes may increase patellofemoral joint stress and contribute to the development of patellofemoral pain. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the association among hip and knee kinematics, pain, and self-reported functional status in males and females with patellofemoral pain. 20 males and 20 females with patellofemoral pain participated in this study. 3-dimensional hip and knee kinematics were quantified while performing a step-down task. A visual analogue scale was used to evaluate usual knee pain. The anterior knee pain scale was used to evaluate the knee functional score. For both groups combined, greater usual pain was associated with greater peak hip adduction, hip internal rotation and knee abduction (r=0.54-0.57, P<0.001). Also, modest to low correlations (r=-0.48 to - 0.37, P=0.03-0.08) were found among hip and knee kinematics and functional score. Stepwise regression revealed that peak hip internal rotation and hip adduction were significant predictors of pain, while peak hip adduction was the only predictor of function. Greater hip adduction, hip internal rotation and knee abduction are associated with higher levels of pain and reduced function in males and females with patellofemoral pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0033-1334966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakagawa, T., Serrão, F., Maciel, C., & Powers, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2013-06-14
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
997-1002
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2088834047
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
Keywords
patellofemoral pain, hip kinematics, knee kinematics, hip adduction, hip internal rotation, knee abduction, knee pain, knee function, sex differences, anterior knee pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Pain Measurement, Regression Analysis, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Young Adult, Patellofemoral Joint, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review