Cited by 33Exercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Rate of Torque Development: A Unique, Non-invasive Indicator of Eccentric-induced Muscle Damage?

Jenkins, N., Housh, T., Traylor, D., Cochrane, K., Bergstrom, H., Lewis, R., Schmidt, R., Johnson, G., Cramer, J.·2014·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

This study examined the time courses of recovery for isometric peak torque and rate of torque development (RTD) after eccentric-induced muscle damage. 18 men completed 6 sets of 10 maximal eccentric isokinetic muscle actions at 30° · s(-1). Peak torque, peak RTD and RTD at 10 (RTD10), 50 (RTD50), 100 (RTD100) and 200 ms (RTD200), serum creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase were measured before (PRE), immediately after (POST), 24, 48 and 72 h after eccentric exercise. Creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase increased from 139 to 6 457 and from 116 to 199 IU · L(-1) from PRE to 72 h, respectively. Peak torque and all RTDs decreased at POST. Peak torque and RTD200 remained lower than PRE through 72 h. Peak RTD remained lower than PRE through 48 h, but was not different from PRE at 72 h. RTD10 and RTD100 were lower than PRE through 24 h, but were not different from PRE at 48 and 72 h. RTD50 decreased at POST, but was not different from PRE at 24 h. Early phase RTDs recovered more quickly than PT and RTD200. Early phase RTDs may reflect neural mechanisms underlying eccentric-induced force decrements, while late RTDs may describe the same physiological mechanisms as PT.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0034-1375696

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with pure maximal voluntary contraction strength, rate of force development is more sensitive to detect acute and chronic changes in neuromuscular function.

    “more sensitive to detect acute and chronic changes in neuromuscular function (see, e.g., Angelozzi et al. 2012; Crameri et al. 2007; Jenkins et al. 2014b; Penailillo et al. 2015)”

    From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Jenkins et al. 2014b

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, N., Housh, T., Traylor, D., Cochrane, K., Bergstrom, H., Lewis, R., Schmidt, R., Johnson, G., & Cramer, J.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Cramer, J.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2014-09-26
Volume
35
Issue
14
Pages
1190-1195
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2318770729
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
rate of torque development, isometric peak torque, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, muscle recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatine Kinase, Humans, Isometric Contraction, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review