Cited by 22Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle activation and electromyography studiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Neuromuscular Responses to 14 Weeks of Traditional and Daily Undulating Resistance Training

Ullrich, B., Holzinger, S., Soleimani, M., Pelzer, T., Stening, J., Pfeiffer, M.·2015·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

This study compared traditional (TP) and daily undulating (DUP) periodization on muscle strength, EMG-estimated neural drive and muscle architecture of the quadriceps femoris (QF). 10 non-athletic females (24.4±3.2 years) performed 14 weeks of isometric training for the QF exercising 1 leg using TP and the contralateral leg using DUP. Intensities varied from 60% to 80% of MVC and the intensity zones and training volume were equated for each leg. Knee extension MVC, maximal voluntary QF-EMG activity and vastus lateralis (VL) muscle architecture were measured in both legs before, after 6 weeks and after 14 weeks of training using dynamometry, surface EMG and ultrasonography. Isometric MVC and maximal QF-EMG remained unaltered after 6 weeks of training, but were significantly (P<0.05) enhanced after 14 weeks in both legs (MVC: TP 24%, DUP 23%; QF-EMG: TP 45%, DUP 46%). VL-architecture remained unchanged following 6 weeks of training, but VL-muscle thickness (TP 17%, DUP 16%) and fascicle length (TP 16%, DUP 17%) displayed significant (P<0.05) enlargements after 14 weeks in both legs. Importantly, these temporal neuromuscular alterations displayed no significant differences between the training legs. Therefore, periodization may not act as a key trigger for neuromuscular adaptations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0034-1398529

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ullrich, B., Holzinger, S., Soleimani, M., Pelzer, T., Stening, J., & Pfeiffer, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biomechanics and Training Science, Olympic Training and Testing Center Rheinland-Pfalz/Saarland, Bad Kreuznach, Germany
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Diakonie Deutschland (DE)
Corresponding author
Ullrich, B.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
36
Issue
07
Pages
554-562
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2315457934
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
undulating periodization, resistance training, neuromuscular adaptation, muscle strength, quadriceps, vastus lateralis, muscle architecture, fascicle length, muscle thickness, isometric training, knee extension, training volume
MeSH terms
Adult, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review