Cited by 14Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trauma Management of the Auricle

Frenzel, Henning, Steffen, Armin·2015·Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Smaller injuries of the auricle, such as lacerations without tissue loss, have more or less standardized treatment protocols that require thorough wound closure of each affected layer. Even extended lacerations of larger parts of the ear quite often heal with only minor irregularities. New in vivo diagnostic tools have aided the understanding of this outstanding "skin flap behavior." At the other end of the trauma severity spectrum are partial or complete amputations of the ear. Here, the debate has become more intense over the last decade. There were numerous reports of successful microvascular reattachments in the 1990s. Consequently, pocket methods and their variations have received increasing attention because the results seem to be convincing. Nevertheless, the pressure damage due to banking larger parts of the elastic cartilage in the mastoid region is tremendous, and the tissue for secondary reconstruction is severely injured. Particularly in cases of acute trauma with relevant concomitant injuries to the patient and in cases in which the amputated area is in a critical state, direct wound closure is a straightforward and safe option. Subsequent thoughtfully planned secondary reconstruction using ear or rib cartilage, or even allogenous material as an ear framework, can achieve excellent aesthetic results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0035-1562882

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection of the surgical procedure to reconstruct the traumatic avulsed ear is driven by several factors including the injury mechanism and extent, the patient's comorbidity, and the surgeon's experience.

    “Selection of the surgical procedure to reconstruct the traumatic avulsed ear is driven by several factors including the injury mechanism and extent, the patient's comorbidity, and the surgeon's experience.[3]”

    From Auricular avulsion injuries (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frenzel, H., & Steffen, A.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Corresponding author
Steffen, Armin
Venue
Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
31
Issue
04
Pages
382-385
ISSN
  • 0736-6825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8793
OpenAlex
W2472463451
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
ear amputation, ear reconstruction, auricular cartilage, costal cartilage, wound closure
MeSH terms
Amputation, Traumatic, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Humans, Replantation, Lacerations, Ear Auricle, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review