Cited by 7Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Large Septal Perforation Repair with Pericranial Flap and Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography

Open access
Williams, Ryan, Lee, Matthew K., Most, Sam P.·2016·Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction

Abstract

Septal perforations present a challenging dilemma for surgical intervention when medical therapy fails. Multiple techniques have been described in the literature to address perforations using numerous techniques; however, there have been varying rates of success and reproducibility reported. The use of a large, pericranial flap was previously described to repair large septal perforation. The objective of this case report is to describe the use of a pedicled pericranial flap in combination with intraoperative fluorescence angiography to quantify vascular perfusion. This article presents a 31-year-old man with an idiopathic, septal perforation measuring 1.7 × 1.7 cm who previously failed medical therapy and surgical repair. He underwent a combined, coronal incision and external rhinoplasty approach with a tunneled pericranial flap resulting in a successful repair. This case report illustrates robust reconstructive capability of pericranial flaps for repair of septal perforations, as well as the potential value of intraoperative fluorescence angiography in determining the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0035-1570073

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surgical techniques for septal perforations depend on the size and location of the obstruction.

    “Surgical techniques depend on the size and location of the obstruction [223,262-269].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [269]

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 9 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1016/j.otc.2009.03.011 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181dec776 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834dfb21 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(200001)22:1<90::AID-HED14>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S002221510700566X · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90128-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.12.006 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1540 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.coms.2012.11.004 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Williams, R., Lee, M. K., & Most, S. P.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
181-184
ISSN
  • 1943-3875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3883
OpenAlex
W2342573891
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
septal perforation, pericranial flap, pedicled flap, nasal septum reconstruction, external rhinoplasty, vascular perfusion, medical therapy failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review