Cited by 27Electronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationERP Systems Implementation and Impact

“Computers can land people on Mars, why can’t they get them to work in a hospital?”: Implementation of an Electronic Patient Record System in a UK Hospital

Jones, M. R.·2003·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Objectives: This paper aims to describe and interpret the implementation of a hospital information system in a large UK hospital. Methods: The paper is based on a longitudinal case study over a three-year period in which a cross section of hospital staff involved with the information system were interviewed. Results and Conclusions: Ambitious government targets for the use of Information Technology in the UK National Health Service sit alongside a history of notable project failures. The decision by a UK hospital to install an advanced, integrated electronic patient record system therefore faced conflicting demands and expectations. This paper suggests that its simple categorisation as either a success or failure is problematic. Rather, the differing viewpoints that lead some clinicians to express “disappointment” with its performance, while others described its features as “tremendous” and managers suggested that the system had become “taken for granted” are explored. A number of broader phenomena relating to the organisational processes surrounding information systems implementation are also identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1634238

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, M. R.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2003
Volume
42
Issue
04
Pages
410-405
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W4323873017
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Keywords
hospital information systems, electronic health records, information system implementation, National Health Service, clinician perceptions, organizational processes, health information technology, large hospitals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review