Cited by 48Electronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationMedical Coding and Health Information

Integrating Health Information Systems: A Critical Appraisal

Monteiro, E.·2003·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to critically assess some of the underlying assumptions behind these initiatives and analyze the dominant expressions, forms and mechanisms of integration. METHODS: This paper employs a discourse analysis to elicit the notion of integration of information systems and its consequences for electronic patient record systems. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: An alternative strategy is outlined, encouraging a more decentralized, multi-vocal approach acknowledging the productive role of related and duplicated information and preserving the existing variety of information systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1634241

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteiro, E.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Monteiro, E.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2003
Volume
42
Issue
04
Pages
428-432
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W1601843949
Cited by
48
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
health information systems integration, electronic health records, information systems integration
MeSH terms
Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Ergonomics, Norway, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Program Development, Systems Integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review