Cited by 453Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

What is Bioinformatics? A Proposed Definition and Overview of the Field

Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., Gerstein, M.·2001·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Background The recent flood of data from genome sequences and functional genomics has given rise to new field, bioinformatics, which combines elements of biology and computer science. Objectives Here we propose a definition for this new field and review some of the research that is being pursued, particularly in relation to transcriptional regulatory systems. Methods Our definition is as follows: Bioinformatics is conceptualizing biology in terms of macromolecules (in the sense of physical-chemistry) and then applying "informatics" techniques (derived from disciplines such as applied maths, computer science, and statistics) to understand and organize the information associated with these molecules, on a large-scale. Results and conclusions Analyses in bioinformatics predominantly focus on three types of large datasets available in molecular biology: macromolecular structures, genome sequences, and the results of functional genomics experiments (e.g. expression data). Additional information includes the text of scientific papers and "relationship data" from metabolic pathways, taxonomy trees, and protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics employs a wide range of computational techniques including sequence and structural alignment, database design and data mining, macromolecular geometry, phylogenetic tree construction, prediction of protein structure and function, gene finding, and expression data clustering. The emphasis is on approaches integrating a variety of com…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1634431

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., & Gerstein, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerstein, M.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2001
Volume
40
Issue
04
Pages
346-358
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W2148319892
Cited by
453
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
genome sequence, functional genomics, macromolecular structure, sequence alignment, phylogenetic tree construction, protein structure prediction, gene discovery, protein-protein interaction network, metabolic pathways, drug design, homology detection, data integration
MeSH terms
DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Drug Design, Gene Expression, Sequence Homology, Computational Biology, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review