CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsHemophilia Treatment and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laboratory Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants: Results of the Second International Workshop for Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants: On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulants/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the ISTH

Brandt, John T, Barna, Linda K, Triplett, Douglas A·1995·Thrombosis and Haemostasis
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1649988
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: Lupus anticoagulants (LAs) are antibodies that interfere with phospholipid dependent coagulation reactions in vitro. This workshop was designed to provide the participants with an experience in identification of LAs, to evaluate different criteria for mixing studies, to assess the performance of recently introduced confirmatory studies and to assess the performance of two potential surrogate LA control plasmas. The results demonstrate that there continues to be significant variation in the sensitivity and responsiveness of APTT reagents to the presence of LAs, confirming the need for more than one screening assay before the presence of a LA can be ruled out. In this workshop, the best distinction between factor deficiency and inhibitors was obtained using a 1:1 mix of normal plasma with patient plasma and the criterion defining correction as shortening of the APTT to within 5 s of the APTT of pooled normal plasma. A 4:1 mix of patient to normal plasma did not work well in distinguishing factor deficiency from inhibitors. The platelet neutralization procedure, DVVconfirm® and StaClot LA® all gave positive results with the LA samples. False positive platelet neutralization procedures were seen with the samples from patients on oral anticoagulants and a factor V inhibitor. False positive StaClot LA results were obtained with high titer factor VIII inhibitors. Both of the potential surrogate plasmas gave variable results with multiple assays; they can not be recommended for routine use at present.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1649988

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 229

Related

Metadata

Authors
Brandt, J. T., Barna, L. K., & Triplett, D. A.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Ball Memorial Hospital (US)
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Published
1995
Volume
74
Issue
06
Pages
1597-1603
ISSN
  • 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2567-689X
DOI
10.1055/s-0038-1649988
OpenAlex
W2417920681
Cited by
228
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, mixing studies, activated partial thromboplastin time, factor deficiency, anticoagulants, factor VIII inhibitors, factor V inhibitor, oral anticoagulants
MeSH terms
Humans, Laboratories, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Predictive Value of Tests, Prothrombin Time, Reproducibility of Results, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review