Cited by 53Memory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Planning Education for Long-Term Retention: The Cognitive Science and Implementation of Retrieval Practice

Open access
Larsen, Douglas·2018·Seminars in Neurology

Abstract

Educational systems are rarely designed for long-term retention of information. Strong evidence has emerged from cognitive psychology and applied education studies that repeated retrieval of information significantly improves retention compared to repeated studying. This effect likely emerges from the processes of memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Consolidation and reconsolidation are the means by which memories are organized into associational networks or schemas that are created and recreated as memories are formed and recalled. As educators implement retrieval practice, they should consider how various test formats lead to different degrees of schema activation. Repeated acts of retrieval provide opportunities for schemas to be updated and strengthened. Spacing of retrieval allows more consolidated schemas to be reactivated. Feedback provides metacognitive monitoring to ensure retrieval accuracy and can lead to shifts from ineffective to effective retrieval strategies. By using the principles of retrieval practice, educators can improve the likelihood that learners will retain information for longer periods of time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1666983

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 53

Authors
Larsen, D.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Larsen, Douglas
Venue
Seminars in Neurology
Published
2018-08
Volume
38
Issue
04
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0271-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9021
OpenAlex
W2888571438
Cited by
53
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
retrieval practice, long-term retention, memory consolidation, memory reconsolidation, schema activation, spacing effect, metacognitive monitoring, feedback, test format, cognitive science of learning, educational design
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Education, Medical, Humans, Neurology, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review