A Novel Nonsurgical Technique for Correcting Congenital Auricular Anomalies
Abstract
Congenital ear anomalies are associated with psychological morbidity. Ear deformities can usually be corrected by nonsurgical techniques such as splinting or molding in the neonatal period, initiated before 6 weeks. Without early corrections, many will require otoplasty during childhood. We introduce a novel silicone-based custom mold technique for congenital ear anomalies. The highly malleable silicone was pushed into every part of the auricle, enabling the auricle to remain in the desired shape, with new molds made weekly. Of 31 newborns (18 males, 13 females), 54 ears were treated. Average age at treatment initiation was 26.8 days. The mean treatment duration was 43.2 days, with a median of 28 days. Normal appearance and parent's satisfaction were achieved in 30 patients with 49 deformed ears and also in four newborns older than 6 weeks. Three concha type microtia in two patients achieved great improvements and parents' satisfaction. No complications were reported. Marked aesthetic improvements and normal appearance were achieved for all deformed auricles treated, and improvements in the concha type microtia will partially alleviate future surgical corrections. The results are not inferior to other techniques. The advantages are as follows: cost-effective, time-saving, simple to master, no need for hair shaving, and easy use for parents. Patients older than 6 weeks of age achieved normal auricle appearance, enabling the correction in older newborns. Custom made silicone auricle molding offers a simple nonsurgical technique for correcting congenital ear anomalies, alleviating the need for future surgical corrections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Procedures before age 4 may not disrupt ear development due to softer cartilage.
“Although ear growth is nearly complete by age 6, procedures before age 4 may not disrupt development due to softer cartilage.41,69”
From Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
The Newborn Butterfly Project: A Shortened Treatment Protocol for Ear Molding
Doft, M. A., Goodkind, A. B., Diamond, S., DiPace, J. I., Kacker, A., & LaBruna, A. N. (2015) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000000999 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam
Kurozumi, N., Ono, S., & Ishida, H. (1982) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(82)90160-6 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Non-surgical correction of deformational auricular anomalies
Schonauer, F., La Rusca, I., & Molea, G. (2009) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.072 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
van Wijk, M. P., Breugem, C. C., & Kon, M. (2012) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.021 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Nonsurgical Management of Congenital Auricular Anomalies
Lennon, C., & Chinnadurai, S. (2018) · Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, C., Wo, P., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.1031575 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“What is more, several simpler and higher cost-effective correction techniques (27, 28) can also be introduced to reduce the cost of treatment.”
BackgroundLv, M.-S., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, P.-W., Zhu, J.-K., Qiu, W.-X., Wang, D.-N., & Zhao, S.-Q. (2024) · The Journal of craniofacial surgery (Print) · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000010125 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“” Duvdevani et al 22 conducted a prospective study using a new type of ear molding (highly malleable silicone) and achieved good results in 4 infants with an initial treatment age of more than 42 days.”
BackgroundEar Molding in Children—Timing, Technique, and Follow-up: A Systematic Review
Sulibhavi, A., Reddy, S. P., Butts, S. C., & Schmalbach, C. E. (2024) · Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine · doi:10.1089/fpsam.2023.0321 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“14,18,23,24,53 Initiation of molding after 6 weeks of age has also shown good outcomes in some cases 32,44,51,53 but has also been associated with lower rates of parental satisfaction, longer length of treatment, and an increased rate of device failures necessitating replacement.”
Wamkpah, N. S., Newsom-Stewart, C., Kimball, A., Baratta, L. R., & Chi, J. J. (2023) · Advances in Cosmetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.yacs.2023.01.010 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
“70–73 Although auricular deformities are not physiologically harmful, they can cause significant psychosocial distress, particularly in children.”
Current Evidence of the Effect of Breastfeeding on Ear Molding Outcomes: A Scoping Review
Chiang, H., Shing, S. R., Su-Genyk, P., Li, L.-L., Kwong, K. M., & Vella, J. B. (2026) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.70413
Alshehri, A. A., Hadi, A. A., Alyami, L., Sulaiman, I. N. A., Hadi, E. M. A., & Hareth, S. Y. A. (2024) · Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1790569
“32 Evident external ear deformities, such as prominent ears, can contribute to psychosocial stress, heightened self-awareness, and challenges with low self-esteem, social withdrawal, anxiety, depression, and behavioral dif fi culties, particularly in the school-age group who become cognizant of…”
Classic ear moulding technique for a lop ear deformity: case report
Touzri, W., Alaoui, M. E. A. T., & Bentahar, O. (2024) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000002379
“Importantly, we still achieved satisfactory results and avoided surgery [9,10] .”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Duvdevani, S. I., Knoller, H., Rozendorn, N., Alon, E. E., & Madgar, O.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Sheba Medical Center (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Duvdevani, Shay I.
- Venue
- Facial Plastic Surgery
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2021-11-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 245-249
- ISSN
- 0736-6825 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-8793
- OpenAlex
- W3215025321
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- microtia, silicone molds, neonates, parental satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Congenital Abnormalities, Aged, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Silicones, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle, Congenital Microtia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review