Cited by 8Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

A Novel Nonsurgical Technique for Correcting Congenital Auricular Anomalies

Duvdevani, Shay I., Knoller, Hadas, Rozendorn, Noa, Alon, Eran E., Madgar, Ory·2022·Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Congenital ear anomalies are associated with psychological morbidity. Ear deformities can usually be corrected by nonsurgical techniques such as splinting or molding in the neonatal period, initiated before 6 weeks. Without early corrections, many will require otoplasty during childhood. We introduce a novel silicone-based custom mold technique for congenital ear anomalies. The highly malleable silicone was pushed into every part of the auricle, enabling the auricle to remain in the desired shape, with new molds made weekly. Of 31 newborns (18 males, 13 females), 54 ears were treated. Average age at treatment initiation was 26.8 days. The mean treatment duration was 43.2 days, with a median of 28 days. Normal appearance and parent's satisfaction were achieved in 30 patients with 49 deformed ears and also in four newborns older than 6 weeks. Three concha type microtia in two patients achieved great improvements and parents' satisfaction. No complications were reported. Marked aesthetic improvements and normal appearance were achieved for all deformed auricles treated, and improvements in the concha type microtia will partially alleviate future surgical corrections. The results are not inferior to other techniques. The advantages are as follows: cost-effective, time-saving, simple to master, no need for hair shaving, and easy use for parents. Patients older than 6 weeks of age achieved normal auricle appearance, enabling the correction in older newborns. Custom made silicone auricle molding offers a simple nonsurgical technique for correcting congenital ear anomalies, alleviating the need for future surgical corrections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0041-1735976

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procedures before age 4 may not disrupt ear development due to softer cartilage.

    “Although ear growth is nearly complete by age 6, procedures before age 4 may not disrupt development due to softer cartilage.41,69”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duvdevani, S. I., Knoller, H., Rozendorn, N., Alon, E. E., & Madgar, O.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Duvdevani, Shay I.
Venue
Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2021-11-23
Volume
38
Issue
03
Pages
245-249
ISSN
  • 0736-6825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8793
OpenAlex
W3215025321
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
microtia, silicone molds, neonates, parental satisfaction
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Aged, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Silicones, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle, Congenital Microtia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review