Cited by 45Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

A prospective study on non-surgical correction of protruding ears: the importance of early treatment.

van Wijk, M.P., Breugem, C.C., Kon, M.·2012·Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Abstract

Objectives Splinting is an elegant method to correct ear deformities in the newborn. However evidence is lacking on the relation between age and efficacy and duration of the treatment. We prospectively studied these questions on protruding ears in 132 babies.Methods A splint in the scaphal hollow was used in combination with tape (Earbuddies(®)). Treatment continued until the desired shape persisted. Results were judged from photographs and mastoid-helical distance was measured.Results In 132 babies 209 ears were treated. Twenty-four patients had no follow-up, 27 stopped therapy for skin irritation and fixation problems. In the remaining patients results were good in 28%, fair in 36%, poor in 36%. Efficacy deteriorates with age; with fair or good results in 66.7% if therapy started before the sixth week. Older children needed to be splinted longer. The anti-helical fold was easier corrected than a deep concha (correction in 69.8% versus 26.8%).Conclusions Considering splinting therapy for protruding ears, a reasonable chance of success can only be offered to parents of children up to six weeks of age. It is favorable if the deformity is mainly due to a flat antihelix.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.021

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Wijk, M. P., Breugem, C. C., & Kon, M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
54-60
ISSN
1748-6815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992244971
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
protruding ears, otoplasty, splinting, non-surgical correction, treatment timing, antihelix, concha, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Splints, Tissue Adhesives, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review