The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mitteilungen aus der Bundesdirektorenkonferenz (BDK)
Abstract
Mit dem multiprofessionell ausgerichteten Arbeitskreis (AK) stellt sich die BDK der Aufgabe, die psychiatrische Versorgung von Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung und psychischen Erkrankungen in Deutschland zu unterstützen, qualitative Verbesserungen voranzutreiben und Fehlentwicklungen entgegenzuwirken. Die Teilnehmer sind Chefärzte, Direktoren, leitende Mitarbeiter und Experten, die überwiegend einen von über 30 Spezialbereichen an Fachkrankenhäusern, Universitätskliniken oder entsprechenden Abteilungen vertreten. Der AK fungiert auf diese Weise als Vernetzungsinstrument, formuliert notwendige, spezifische Anforderungen und setzt sich für eine Anpassung der Behandlungsangebote an den tatsächlichen Bedarf, eine weitere Diversifizierung der Versorgungslandschaft und eine Verbindung von Spezialisierung und „Gemeindenähe“ z. B. durch aufsuchende Ambulanzarbeit ein. Er arbeitet eng vernetzt mit dem Referat Geistige Behinderung der DGPPN.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many Syrian refugees were exposed to sequential traumatizing events including war, escape, and post-migration stressors, which significantly increase the risk to develop symptoms of posttraumatic stress and other mental disorders.
“Many of them were exposed to sequential traumatizing events including war, escape and post-migration stressors, which significantly increase the risk to develop symptoms of posttraumatic stress and other mental disorders.”
From HELP@APP: Development and evaluation of a self-help app for traumatized Syrian refugees in Germany- A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Golchert, J., Roehr, S., Berg, F., Grochtdreis, T., Hoffmann, R., Jung, F., Nagl, M., Plexnies, A., Renner, A., König, H.-H., et al. (2019) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollmächer, T., & Schreiber, W.
- Affiliations
- Ingolstadt
- Deggendorf
- Venue
- Psychiatrische Praxis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2016-11-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 456-456
- ISSN
- 0303-4259 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0876
- OpenAlex
- W2564689680
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatrische Praxis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- intellectual disability, psychiatric nursing, mental illness, psychiatric hospitals, community psychiatry, professional networking, DGPPN
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
