Cited by 27Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNoise Effects and Management

Evaluation and Treatment of Severe Hyperacusis

Open access
Valente, Michael, Goebel, Joel, Duddy, Diane, Sinks, Belinda, Peterein, Judy·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Abstract

A 52-year-old male was evaluated by the authors after initially reporting fullness in his left ear while traveling on an airplane. A unique feature of the patient's complaint was the development of severe bilateral hyperacusis (loudness discomfort levels of between 20–34 dB HL) in spite of the fact that the hearing loss was initially reported in the left ear. To achieve loudness comfort, the patient was initially fit with ER-25 musician earplugs that proved to be unsuccessful. The patient next purchased earplugs and earmuffs from a gun shop in order to obtain relief from the pain and discomfort caused by his exposure to everyday environmental sounds. This paper describes the use of hearing devices that proved to be effective in providing attenuation sufficient that the patient rarely needs to rely on earplugs and ear-muffs for relief from his hyperacusis. Abbreviations: CBC = complete blood count, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate, LDL= loudness discomfort level

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0042-1748057

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. Hazell J, Sheldrake J. (1991). Hyperacusis and tinnitus. In: Aran J, Dauman R, eds, Proceedings N International Seminar. Amsterdam: Ghedini Publications, 245-248.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valente, M., Goebel, J., Duddy, D., Sinks, B., & Peterein, J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
Published
2000-06
Volume
11
Issue
06
Pages
295-299
ISSN
  • 1050-0545 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-3107
OpenAlex
W1538341055
Cited by
27
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
hyperacusis, loudness discomfort level, aircraft cabin noise, noise-induced hearing loss, hearing protection, earplugs, earmuffs
MeSH terms
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Audiometry, Audiometry, Evoked Response, Diuretics, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Methylprednisolone, Middle Aged, Hyperacusis, Severity of Illness Index, Tinnitus, Valsalva Maneuver, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review