Cited by 6Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Monoclonal antibodies against beta-amyloid protein (lecanemab and donanemab) should not be used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Nitrini, Ricardo, Studart-Neto, Adalberto·2025·Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract

Two antiamyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), lecanemab and donanemab, were recently launched for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These mAbs remove amyloid protein from the brain and cause statistically significant improvement in cognitive/functional tests, meaning a change in evolution of AD. This is important to reinforce the amyloid cascade hypothesis and to further concentrate studies on the pathways from the deposition of the beta-amyloid protein to synaptic loss and neuronal death. However, it is necessary to evaluate whether the results are clinically important. Analysis of the clinical trials showed that the statistically significant differences over placebo did not reach the minimum clinically important difference that would be meaningful for patients, caregivers and clinicians. Besides, the incidence of adverse events is high and potentially severe. Although there are reasons to celebrate this first step towards disease-modifying therapies for AD, lecanemab and donanemab should not be used to treat AD in clinical pratice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0045-1808082

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [3]Heneka M T Morgan D Jessen F Passive anti-amyloid β immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease-opportunities and challenges Lancet 2024 404(10468): 2198 2208 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01883-X 39549715 · DOI
  2. [4]Wicker A Shriram J Decourt B Sabbagh M N Passive Anti-amyloid Beta Monoclonal Antibodies: Lessons Learned over Past 20 Years Neurol Ther 2024 13 06 1571 1595 10.1007/s40120-024-00664-z 39378014 PMC11541067 · DOI
  3. [5]Castellani R J Perry G The Teflon hypothesis Brain Commun 2023 5 04 fcad203 10.1093/braincomms/fcad203 37492487 PMC10365830 · DOI
  4. [6]Van Dyck C H Swanson C J Aisen P Bateman R J Chen C Gee M Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease N Engl J Med 2023 388 01 9 21 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948 36449413 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [8]TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Investigators Sims J R Zimmer J A Evans C D Lu M Ardayfio P Sparks J Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA 2023 330 06 512 527 10.1001/jama.2023.13239 37459141 PMC10352931 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [10]Liu K Y Schneider L S Howard R The need to show minimum clinically important differences in Alzheimer's disease trials Lancet Psychiatry 2021 8 11 1013 1016 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00197-8 34087114 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [11]Willis B Hussein Z Hayato S Takenaka O Penner N Yasuda S Reyderman L Exposure-response modeling to describe the change in brain amyloid following lecanemab administration in patients with early Alzheimer's disease Alzheimers Dement 2023 19 21 e080393 10.1002/alz.080393 · DOI
  8. [12]Wang G Cutter G Oxtoby N P Shan G Wang W Mangal B Statistical considerations when estimating time-saving treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials Alzheimers Dement 2024 20 08 5421 5433 10.1002/alz.14035 39030751 PMC11350030 · DOI
  9. [13]Goldberg T E Lee S Devanand D P Schneider L S Comparison of relative change with effect size metrics in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023 95 01 2 7 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331941 37979967 PMC11299058 · DOI
  10. [14]Kurkinen M Anti-amyloid therapies do not slow Alzheimer's disease progression Dement Neuropsychol 2024 17 e20230099 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0099 38189031 PMC10768645 · DOI
  11. [15]Jack C R Jr Andrews J S Beach T G Buracchio T Dunn B Graf A Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup Alzheimers Dement 2024 20 08 5143 5169 10.1002/alz.13859 38934362 PMC11350039 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [16]Dantas J M Mutarelli A Navalha D DP Dagostin C S Romeiro P HCL Felix N Efficacy of anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibody therapy in early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neurol Sci 2024 45 06 2461 2469 10.1007/s10072-023-07194-w 37978096 · DOI
  13. [18]Reish N J Jamshidi P Stamm B Flanagan M E Sugg E Tang M Multiple Cerebral Hemorrhages in a Patient Receiving Lecanemab and Treated with t-PA for Stroke N Engl J Med 2023 388 05 478 479 10.1056/NEJMc2215148 36599061 PMC10228637 · DOI
  14. [19]van der Flier W M Clinical aspects of microbleeds in Alzheimer's disease J Neurol Sci 2012 322(1-2): 56 58 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.009 22836015 · DOI
  15. [20]Vázquez-Justes D Aguirregoicoa I Fernandez L Carnes-Vendrell A Dakterzada F Sanjuan L Clinical impact of microbleeds in patients with Alzheimer's disease BMC Geriatr 2022 22 01 774 10.1186/s12877-022-03456-y 36175849 PMC9520821 · DOI
  16. [21]Pittock R R Aakre J A Castillo A M Ramanan V K Kremers W K Jack C R Jr Eligibility for Anti-Amyloid Treatment in a Population-Based Study of Cognitive Aging Neurology 2023 101 19 e1837 e1849 37586881 PMC10663008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitrini, R., & Studart-Neto, A.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Venue
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Published
2025-05
Volume
83
Issue
05
Pages
001-005
ISSN
  • 0004-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1678-4227
OpenAlex
W4410221453
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, lecanemab, donanemab, anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, amyloid-beta, amyloid hypothesis, disease-modifying therapy, minimal clinically important difference, adverse events, clinical trial results, synaptic loss, neuronal cell death
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review