Cited by 2,803Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup

Open access
Jack, Clifford R., Andrews, J. Scott, Beach, Thomas G., Buracchio, Teresa, Dunn, Billy, Graf, Ana, Hansson, Oskar, Ho, Carole +12 more·2024·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened three separate work groups in 2011 and single work groups in 2012 and 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present document updates the 2018 research framework in response to several recent developments. Defining diseases biologically, rather than based on syndromic presentation, has long been standard in many areas of medicine (e.g., oncology), and is becoming a unifying concept common to all neurodegenerative diseases, not just AD. The present document is consistent with this principle. Our intent is to present objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD, incorporating recent advances in biomarkers, to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to provide step‐by‐step clinical practice guidelines for clinical workflow or specific treatment protocols, but rather serve as general principles to inform diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. Highlights: We define Alzheimer's disease (AD) to be a biological process that begins with the appearance of AD neuropathologic change (ADNPC) while people are asymptomatic. Progression of the neuropathologic burden leads to the later appearance and progression of clinical symptoms. Early‐changing Core 1 biomarkers (amyloid positron emission tomography [PET], approved cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and accurate plasma biomarkers [especially phosphorylated tau 217]) map onto either the amyloid beta or AD tauopathy pathway; however, these reflect the presence of ADNPC more generally (i.e., both neuritic plaques and tangles). An abnormal Core 1 biomarker result is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of AD and to inform clinical decision making throughout the disease continuum. Later‐changing Core 2 biomarkers (biofluid and tau PET) can provide prognostic information, and when abnormal, will increase confidence that AD is contributing to symptoms. An integrated biological and clinical staging scheme is described that accommodates the fact that common copathologies, cognitive reserve, and resistance may modify relationships between clinical and biological AD stages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.13859

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alzheimer's disease is characterized by two core biomarkers: amyloid beta plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles.

    “Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by two core biomarkers: amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles.”

    From Unique transcriptomic alterations in 5XFAD;PS19 mouse model identify glial lipid dysregulation and coordinated microglial–oligodendrocyte responses (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Biomarker Categorization section identifies Aβ and tau as core biomarker categories, and the Highlights describe AD neuropathologic change as including neuritic plaques and tangles. But the paper distinguishes those pathologic deposits from the biomarker tests that detect or reflect them; it does not call plaques and tangles themselves the two core biomarkers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The updated diagnostic framework incorporating fluid and imaging biomarkers enables more precise staging and individualized treatment plans.

    “The updated diagnostic framework, incorporating fluid and imaging biomarkers, enables more precise staging and individualized treatment plans.”
  • The six stages of Alzheimer's disease along its continuum are defined by the latest research published in 2024.

    “This section describes the six stages of AD along its continuum, as defined by the latest research published in 2024 (Table 2).11,12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 189

  1. [1]Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Assocation workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7: 280‐ 292. 21514248 PMC3220946
  2. [3]McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Assocation Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7: 263‐ 269. 21514250 PMC3312024
  3. [8]Jack Jr. CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. A/T/N: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology. 2016; 87: 539‐ 547. 27371494 PMC4970664
  4. [11]Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Beach TG, et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid‐beta plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11: 669‐ 678. 22749065
  5. [12]Murray ME, Lowe VJ, Graff‐Radford NR, et al. Clinicopathologic and 11C‐Pittsburgh compound B implications of Thal amyloid phase across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Brain. 2015; 138: 1370‐ 1381. 25805643 PMC4407190
  6. [16]Villemagne VL, Lopresti BJ, Dore V, et al. What is T+? A gordian knot of tracers, thresholds, and topographies. J Nucl Med. 2021; 62: 614‐ 619. 33384320
  7. [18]Fagan AM, Mintun MA, Mach RH, et al. Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59: 512‐ 519. 16372280
  8. [19]Schindler SE, Gray JD, Gordon BA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measured by Elecsys assays compared to amyloid imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14: 1460‐ 1469. 29501462 PMC6119652
  9. [20]Landau SM, Lu M, Joshi AD, et al. Comparing positron emission tomography imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measurements of beta‐amyloid. Ann Neurol. 2013; 74: 826‐ 836. 23536396 PMC3748164
  10. [21]Barthelemy NR, Li Y, Joseph‐Mathurin N, et al. A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2020; 26: 398‐ 407. 32161412 PMC7309367
  11. [22]Janelidze S, Berron D, Smith R, et al. Associations of Plasma Phospho‐Tau217 levels with tau positron emission tomography in early Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2021; 78: 149‐ 156. 33165506 PMC7653537
  12. [24]Therriault J, Vermeiren M, Servaes S, et al. Association of phosphorylated tau biomarkers with amyloid positron emission tomography vs tau positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 2023; 80: 188‐ 199. 36508198 PMC9856704
  13. [26]Mattsson‐Carlgren N, Janelidze S, Bateman RJ, et al. Soluble P‐tau217 reflects amyloid and tau pathology and mediates the association of amyloid with tau. EMBO Mol Med. 2021; 13: e14022. 33949133 PMC8185545
  14. [27]Pichet Binette A, Franzmeier N, Spotorno N, et al. Amyloid‐associated increases in soluble tau relate to tau aggregation rates and cognitive decline in early Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 6635. 36333294 PMC9636262
  15. [28]Horie K, Barthelemy NR, Spina S, et al. CSF tau microtubule‐binding region identifies pathological changes in primary tauopathies. Nat Med. 2022; 28: 2547‐ 2554. 36424467 PMC9800273
  16. [29]Salvado G, Horie K, Barthelemy NR, et al. Novel CSF tau biomarkers can be used for disease staging of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. medRxiv. 2023. Online Ahead of Print.
  17. [31]Teunissen CE, Verberk IMW, Thijssen EH, et al. Blood‐based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: towards clinical implementation. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21: 66‐ 77. 34838239
  18. [32]Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2021; 27: 954‐ 963. 34083813
  19. [33]Hansson O, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Dage J. Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice and trials. Nat Aging. 2023; 3: 506‐ 519. 37202517 PMC10979350
  20. [34]Schindler S, Galasko D, Pereira A, et al. I use in symptomatic patients: recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease. Nature Rev Neurol. 2024. 38866966
  21. [35]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Botha H, et al. The bivariate distribution of amyloid‐beta and tau: relationship with established neurocognitive clinical syndromes. Brain. 2019; 142: 3230‐ 3242. 31501889 PMC6763736
  22. [36]Costoya‐Sanchez A, Moscoso A, Silva‐Rodriguez J, et al. Increased medial temporal tau positron emission tomography uptake in the absence of amyloid‐beta positivity. JAMA Neurol. 2023; 80: 1051‐ 1061. 37578787 PMC10425864
  23. [37]Jack CR Jr., Knopman DS, Chetelat G, et al. Suspected non‐Alzheimer disease pathophysiology – concept and controversy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016; 12: 117‐ 124. 26782335 PMC4784257
  24. [38]Erickson P, Simren J, Brum WS, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of a β‐amyloid‐negative, tau‐positive cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2023; 80: 969‐ 979. 37523162 PMC10391361
  25. [39]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Age‐specific population frequencies of cerebral beta‐amyloidosis and neurodegeneration among people with normal cognitive function aged 50‐89 years: a cross‐sectional study. The Lancet Neurology. 2014; 13: 997‐ 1005. 25201514 PMC4324499
  26. [40]Ossenkoppele R, Pichet Binette A, Groot C, et al. Amyloid and tau PET‐positive cognitively unimpaired individuals are at high risk for future cognitive decline. Nat Med. 2022; 28: 2381‐ 2387. 36357681 PMC9671808
  27. [41]Landau SM, Mormino EC. Tau pathology without Aβ‐A limited PART of clinical progression. JAMA Neurol. 2023; 80: 1025‐ 1027. 37578768
  28. [42]Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, et al. Primary age‐related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2014; 128: 755‐ 766. 25348064 PMC4257842
  29. [43]Mintun MA, Larossa GN, Sheline YI, et al. [ 11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006; 67: 446‐ 452. 16894106
  30. [44]Aizenstein HJ, Nebes RD, Saxton JA, et al. Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. Arch Neurol. 2008; 65: 1509‐ 1517. 19001171 PMC2636844
  31. [45]Jack CR Jr., Lowe VJ, Senjem ML, et al. 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Brain. 2008; 131: 665‐ 680. 18263627 PMC2730157
  32. [46]Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. New Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 795‐ 804. 22784036 PMC3474597
  33. [47]Benzinger TL, Blazey T, Jack CR Jr., et al. Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: E4502‐ 4509. 24194552 PMC3839740
  34. [48]Li Y, Yen D, Hendrix RD, et al. Timing of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease in estimated years from symptom onset. Ann Neurol. 2024; 95: 951‐ 965. 38400792 PMC11060905
  35. [49]Guo T, Korman D, Baker SL, Landau SM, Jagust WJ, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Longitudinal cognitive and biomarker measurements support a unidirectional pathway in Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. Biol Psychiatry. 2021; 89: 786‐ 794. 32919611 PMC9682985
  36. [50]Jia J, Ning Y, Chen M, et al. Biomarker changes during 20 years preceding Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2024; 390: 712‐ 722. 38381674
  37. [51]Jack CR Jr., Lowe VJ, Weigand SD, et al. Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2009; 132: 1355‐ 1365. 19339253 PMC2677798
  38. [52]Brookmeyer R, Evans DA, Hebert L, et al. National estimates of the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7: 61‐ 73. 21255744 PMC3052294
  39. [53]Jack CR Jr., Therneau TM, Lundt ES, et al. Long‐term associations between amyloid positron emission tomography, sex, apolipoprotein E and incident dementia and mortality among individuals without dementia: hazard ratios and absolute risk. Brain Commun. 2022; 4: fcac017. 35310829 PMC8924651
  40. [56]McCarron M, McCallion P, Reilly E, Dunne P, Carroll R, Mulryan N. A prospective 20‐year longitudinal follow‐up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017; 61: 843‐ 852. 28664561
  41. [57]Simuni T, Chahine LM, Poston KL, et al. Biological definition of neuronal alpha‐synuclein disease: towards an integrated staging system for research. Lancet Neurol. 2023; 23: 178‐ 190. 38267190
  42. [58]Hoglinger GU, Adler CH, Berg D, et al. A biological classification of Parkinson's disease: the SynNeurGe research diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2024; 23: 191‐ 204. 38267191
  43. [59]Tabrizi SJ, Schobel S, Gantman EC, et al. A biological classification of Huntington's disease: the Integrated Staging System. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21: 632‐ 644. 35716693
  44. [60]Benatar M, Wuu J, McHutchison C, et al. Preventing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: insights from pre‐symptomatic neurodegenerative diseases. Brain. 2022; 145: 27‐ 44. 34677606 PMC8967095
  45. [63]Beach TG, Adler CH, Sue LI, et al. Arizona Study of aging and neurodegenerative disorders and brain and body donation program. Neuropathology. 2015; 35: 354‐ 389. 25619230 PMC4593391
  46. [64]Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, et al. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. 2008; 30: 58‐ 69. 18259084 PMC2821441
  47. [68]Mattsson‐Carlgren N, Grinberg LT, Boxer A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in autopsy‐confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2022; 98: e1137‐ e1150. 35173015 PMC8935438
  48. [69]Janelidze S, Bali D, Ashton NJ, et al. Head‐to‐head comparison of 10 plasma phospho‐tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2023; 146: 1592‐ 1601. 36087307 PMC10115176
  49. [71]Zicha S, Bateman RJ, Shaw LM, et al. Comparative analytical performance of multiple plasma Aβ42 and Aβ40 assays and their ability to predict positron emission tomography amyloid positivity. Alzheimers Dement. 2022; 19: 956‐ 966. 35820077 PMC10518222
  50. [74]Therriault J, Servaes S, Tissot C, et al. Equivalence of plasma p‐tau217 with cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 4967‐ 4977. 37078495 PMC10587362
  51. [75]Janelidze S, Mattsson N, Palmqvist S, et al. Plasma P‐tau181 in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer's dementia. Nat Med. 2020; 26: 379‐ 386. 32123385
  52. [77]Groot C, Cicognola C, Bali D, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer's disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p‐tau217. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022; 14: 67. 35568889 PMC9107269
  53. [78]Mielke MM, Hagen CE, Xu J, et al. Plasma phospho‐tau181 increases with Alzheimer's disease clinical severity and is associated with tau‐ and amyloid‐positron emission tomography. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14: 989‐ 997. 29626426 PMC6097897
  54. [79]Karikari TK, Pascoal TA, Ashton NJ, et al. Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19: 422‐ 433. 32333900
  55. [80]Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Quiroz YT, et al. Discriminative accuracy of plasma phospho‐tau217 for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA Neurol. 2020; 324: 772‐ 781. PMC7388060 32722745
  56. [81]Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Wolf A, et al. Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Nat Med. 2020; 26: 387‐ 397. 32123386 PMC7101073
  57. [82]Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Cullen N, et al. Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho‐tau combined with other accessible measures. Nat Med. 2021; 27: 1034‐ 1042. 34031605
  58. [84]Moscoso A, Grothe MJ, Ashton NJ, et al. Longitudinal associations of blood phosphorylated tau181 and neurofilament light chain with neurodegeneration in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2021; 78: 396‐ 406. 33427873 PMC7802009
  59. [85]Brickman AM, Manly JJ, Honig LS, et al. Plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, and other blood‐based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in a multi‐ethnic, community study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 17: 1353‐ 1364. 33580742 PMC8451860
  60. [88]Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V, et al. High‐precision plasma beta‐amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology. 2019; 93: e1647‐ e1659. 31371569 PMC6946467
  61. [89]Brand AL, Lawler PE, Bollinger JG, et al. The performance of plasma amyloid beta measurements in identifying amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease: a literature review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022; 14: 195. 36575454 PMC9793600
  62. [90]Rabe C, Bittner T, Jethwa A, et al. Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid‐beta(42/40) prescreening. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 1393‐ 1402. 36150024
  63. [91]Cullen NC, Janelidze S, Mattsson‐Carlgren N, et al. Test‐retest variability of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and its effects on clinical prediction models. Alzheimers Dement. 2022. PMC9747985 35699240
  64. [92]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13: 205‐ 216. 27697430 PMC5344738
  65. [93]Klunk WE, Cohen A, Bi W, et al. Why We Need Two Cutoffs for Amyloid‐Imaging: Early Versus Alzheimer's‐Like Amyloid‐Positivity. Alzheimer's Association International Conference; 2012; Alzheimer's Associaton: P453‐ P454.
  66. [94]Brum WS, Cullen NC, Janelidze S, et al. A two‐step workflow based on plasma p‐tau217 to screen for amyloid beta positivity with further confirmatory testing only in uncertain cases. Nat Aging. 2023; 3: 1079‐ 1090. 37653254 PMC10501903
  67. [95]Brum WS, Ashton NJ, Simren J, et al. Biological variation estimates of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in healthy individuals. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 20: 1284‐ 1297. 37985230 PMC10916965
  68. [96]Landau SM, Horng A, Jagust WJ, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Memory decline accompanies subthreshold amyloid accumulation. Neurology. 2018; 90: e1452‐ e1460. 29572282 PMC5921038
  69. [97]Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Moving fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease from research tools to routine clinical diagnostics. Mol Neurodegener. 2021; 16: 10. 33608044 PMC7893769
  70. [98]Cousins KAQ, Shaw LM, Shellikeri S, et al. Elevated Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2022; 92: 807‐ 818. 35877814 PMC9588516
  71. [99]Brum WS, Docherty KF, Ashton NJ, et al. Effect of neprilysin inhibition on Alzheimer disease plasma biomarkers: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2023; 81: 197‐ 200. PMC10728797 38109077
  72. [100]Graff‐Radford J, Jones DT, Wiste HJ, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and discordant amyloid biomarkers. Neurobiol Aging. 2022; 110: 27‐ 36. 34844077 PMC8758540
  73. [101]Mielke MM, Dage JL, Frank RD, et al. Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community. Nat Med. 2022; 28: 1398‐ 1405. 35618838 PMC9329262
  74. [102]O'Bryant SE, Petersen M, Hall J, Johnson LA, Team H‐HS. Medical comorbidities and ethnicity impact plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: important considerations for clinical trials and practice. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 36‐ 43. 35235702 PMC13270989
  75. [103]Pichet Binette A, Janelidze S, Cullen N, et al. Confounding factors of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers and their impact on clinical performance. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 1403‐ 1414. 36152307 PMC10499000
  76. [104]Huber H, Ashton NJ, Schieren A, et al. Levels of Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers are altered after food intake‐A pilot intervention study in healthy adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 5531‐ 5540. 37243891
  77. [105]Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of amyloid positron emission tomography with subsequent change in clinical management among medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. JAMA. 2019; 321: 1286‐ 1294. 30938796 PMC6450276
  78. [107]Strikwerda‐Brown C, Hobbs DA, Gonneaud J, et al. Association of elevated amyloid and tau positron emission tomography signal with near‐term development of Alzheimer disease symptoms in older adults without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79: 975‐ 985. 35907254 PMC9339146
  79. [109]Ebenau JL, Timmers T, Wesselman LMP, et al. ATN classification and clinical progression in subjective cognitive decline: the SCIENCe project. Neurology. 2020; 95: e46‐ e58. 32522798 PMC7371376
  80. [110]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Therneau TM, et al. Associations of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarker profiles with rates of memory decline among individuals without dementia. JAMA. 2019; 321: 2316‐ 2325. 31211344 PMC6582267
  81. [111]Therriault J, Pascoal TA, Lussier FZ, et al. Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer's disease using PET‐based Braak staging. Nat Aging. 2022; 2: 526‐ 535. 37118445 PMC10154209
  82. [112]Grothe MJ, Barthel H, Sepulcre J, et al. In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition. Neurology. 2017; 89: 2031‐ 2038. 29046362 PMC5711511
  83. [113]Mattsson N, Palmqvist S, Stomrud E, Vogel J, Hansson O. Staging beta‐amyloid pathology with amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 2019; 76: 1319‐ 1329. 31314895 PMC6646987
  84. [114]Collij LE, Heeman F, Salvado G, et al. Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging. Neurology. 2020; 95: e1538‐ e1553. 32675080 PMC7713745
  85. [117]Schwarz AJ, Shcherbinin S, Slieker LJ, et al. Topographic staging of tau positron emission tomography images. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018; 10: 221‐ 231. 29780867 PMC5956800
  86. [118]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Algeciras‐Schimnich A, et al. Predicting amyloid PET and tau PET stages with plasma biomarkers. Brain. 2023; 146: 2029‐ 2044. 36789483 PMC10151195
  87. [119]Wang L, Benzinger TL, Su Y, et al. Evaluation of tau imaging in staging alzheimer disease and revealing interactions between beta‐amyloid and tauopathy. JAMA Neurol. 2016; 73: 1070‐ 1077. 27454922 PMC5237382
  88. [120]Villemagne VL, Dore V, Bourgeat P, et al. The tau MeTeR scale for the generation of continuous and categorical measures of tau deposits in the brain: results from 18F‐AV1451 and 18F‐THK5351 tau imaging studies. Alzheimer's dement. 2016; 12: 244.26218444
  89. [121]Jack CR Jr., Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9: 119‐ 128. 20083042 PMC2819840
  90. [122]Jack CR Jr., Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12: 207‐ 216. 23332364 PMC3622225
  91. [123]Smith R, Cullen NC, Pichet Binette A, et al. Tau‐PET is superior to phospho‐tau when predicting cognitive decline in symptomatic AD patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 2497‐ 2507. 36516028 PMC10264552
  92. [124]Ossenkoppele R, Schonhaut DR, Scholl M, et al. Tau PET patterns mirror clinical and neuroanatomical variability in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2016; 139: 1551‐ 1567. 26962052 PMC5006248
  93. [126]Gordon BA, Blazey TM, Christensen J, et al. Tau PET in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: relationship with cognition, dementia and other biomarkers. Brain. 2019; 142: 1063‐ 1076. 30753379 PMC6439328
  94. [128]Hanseeuw BJ, Betensky RA, Jacobs HIL, et al. Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study. JAMA Neurol. 2019; 76: 915‐ 924. 31157827 PMC6547132
  95. [129]Berron D, Vogel JW, Insel PS, et al. Early stages of tau pathology and its associations with functional connectivity, atrophy and memory. Brain. 2021; 144: 2771‐ 2783. 33725124 PMC8557349
  96. [130]Leuzy A, Smith R, Cullen NC, et al. Biomarker‐based prediction of longitudinal tau positron emission tomography in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79: 149‐ 158. 34928318 PMC8689441
  97. [132]Vogel JW, Young AL, Oxtoby NP, et al. Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2021; 27: 871‐ 881. 33927414 PMC8686688
  98. [134]Sanchez JS, Becker JA, Jacobs HIL, et al. The cortical origin and initial spread of medial temporal tauopathy in Alzheimer's disease assessed with positron emission tomography. Sci Transl Med. 2021; 13: eabc0655. 33472953 PMC7978042
  99. [135]Mattsson‐Carlgren N, Collij LE, Stomrud E, et al. Plasma biomarker strategy for selecting patients with Alzheimer disease for antiamyloid immunotherapies. JAMA Neurol. 2024; 81: 69‐ 78. 38048096 PMC10696515
  100. [136]Montoliu‐Gaya L, Benedet AL, Tissot C, et al. Mass spectrometric simultaneous quantification of tau species in plasma shows differential associations with amyloid and tau pathologies. Nat Aging. 2023; 3: 661‐ 669. 37198279 PMC10275761
  101. [137]Horie K, Barthelemy NR, Sato C, Bateman RJ. CSF tau microtubule binding region identifies tau tangle and clinical stages of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2021; 144: 515‐ 527. 33283854 PMC7940175
  102. [139]Horie K, Salvado G, Barthelemy NR, et al. CSF MTBR‐tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2023; 29: 1954‐ 1963. 37443334 PMC10427417
  103. [140]Lantero‐Rodriguez J, Montoliu‐Gaya L, Benedet AL, et al. CSF p‐tau205: a biomarker of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2024; 147: 12. 38184490 PMC10771353
  104. [141]Horie K, Koppisetti RK, Janelidzde S, et al. Plasma MTBR‐tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease 2023. 2023. PMC10427417 37443334
  105. [143]Villemagne V, Leuzy A, Bohorquez SMS, et al. CenTauR: towards a universal scale and masks for standardizing tau imaging studies. Alzheimer's and Dementia. 2023; 15: e12454. PMC10326476 37424964
  106. [144]Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, et al. The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimer's Dement. 2015; 11: 1‐ 15. PMC4300247 25443857
  107. [145]Therriault J, Schindler SE, Salvado G, et al. Biomarker‐based staging of Alzheimer disease: rationale and clinical applications. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024. 38429551
  108. [146]Klunk WE, Price JC, Mathis CA, et al. Amyloid deposition begins in the striatum of presenilin‐1 mutation carriers from two unrelated pedigrees. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 6174‐ 6184. 17553989 PMC3265970
  109. [147]Cohen AD, McDade E, Christian B, et al. Early striatal amyloid deposition distinguishes Down syndrome and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease from late‐onset amyloid deposition. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14: 743‐ 750. 29477284 PMC5994364
  110. [150]Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: the TRAILBLAZER‐ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023; 330: 512‐ 527. 37459141 PMC10352931
  111. [151]Sperling RA, Rentz DM, Johnson KA, et al. The A4 study: stopping AD before symptoms begin? Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6: 228fs213. PMC4049292 24648338
  112. [152]Rafii MS, Sperling RA, Donohue MC, et al. The AHEAD 3‐45 study: design of a prevention trial for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 1227‐ 1233. 35971310 PMC9929028
  113. [153]Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. The American journal of psychiatry. 1982; 139: 1136‐ 1139. 7114305
  114. [155]Ismail Z, Smith EE, Geda Y, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2016; 12: 195‐ 202. 26096665 PMC4684483
  115. [156]Johansson M, Stomrud E, Lindberg O, et al. Apathy and anxiety are early markers of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2020; 85: 74‐ 82. 31735378
  116. [157]Johansson M, Stomrud E, Johansson PM, et al. Development of apathy, anxiety, and depression in cognitively unimpaired older adults: effects of Alzheimer's disease pathology and cognitive decline. Biol Psychiatry. 2022; 92: 34‐ 43. 35346458
  117. [158]Graff‐Radford J, Yong KXX, Apostolova LG, et al. New insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2021; 20: 222‐ 234. 33609479 PMC8056394
  118. [161]van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388: 9‐ 21. 36449413
  119. [163]Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58: 1985‐ 1992. 11735772
  120. [164]Roberts JS, Karlawish JH, Uhlmann WR, Petersen RC, Green RC. Mild cognitive impairment in clinical care: a survey of American Academy of Neurology members. Neurology. 2010; 75: 425‐ 431. 20679636 PMC2918467
  121. [165]Bertens D, Vos S, Kehoe P, et al. Use of mild cognitive impairment and prodromal AD/MCI due to AD in clinical care: a European survey. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019; 11: 74. 31439020 PMC6706888
  122. [166]Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, et al. Association of lifetime intellectual enrichment with cognitive decline in the older population. JAMA Neurol. 2014; 71: 1017‐ 1024. 25054282 PMC4266551
  123. [168]Arenaza‐Urquijo EM, Vemuri P. Resistance vs resilience to Alzheimer disease: clarifying terminology for preclinical studies. Neurology. 2018; 90: 695‐ 703. 29592885 PMC5894932
  124. [170]Kmezic I, Samuelsson K, Finn A, et al. Neurofilament light chain and total tau in the differential diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of acute and chronic inflammatory polyneuropathies. Eur J Neurol. 2022; 29: 2810‐ 2822. 35638376 PMC9542418
  125. [171]Jack CR Jr., Petersen RC, O'Brien PC, Tangalos EG. MR‐based hippocampal volumetry in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1992; 42: 183‐ 188. 1734300
  126. [172]Bobinski M, de Leon MJ, Wegiel J, et al. The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging‐determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience. 2000; 95: 721‐ 725. 10670438
  127. [174]Jack CR Jr., Dickson DW, Parisi JE, et al. Antemortem MRI findings correlate with hippocampal neuropathology in typical aging and dementia. Neurology. 2002; 58: 750‐ 757. 11889239 PMC2745935
  128. [175]Thijssen EH, Verberk IMW, Kindermans J, et al. Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022; 14: e12285. 35603139 PMC9107685
  129. [176]Finnema SJ, Nabulsi NB, Eid T, et al. Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8: 348ra396. 27440727
  130. [177]Mecca AP, Chen MK, O'Dell RS, et al. In vivo measurement of widespread synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease with SV2A PET. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16: 974‐ 982. 32400950 PMC7383876
  131. [178]Gouw AA, Alsema AM, Tijms BM, et al. EEG spectral analysis as a putative early prognostic biomarker in nondemented, amyloid positive subjects. Neurobiol Aging. 2017; 57: 133‐ 142. 28646686
  132. [179]Haass C, Selkoe D. If amyloid drives Alzheimer disease, why have anti‐amyloid therapies not yet slowed cognitive decline? PLoS Biol. 2022; 20: e3001694. 35862308 PMC9302755
  133. [183]Verberk IMW, Laarhuis MB, van den Bosch KA, et al. Serum markers glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light for prognosis and monitoring in cognitively normal older people: a prospective memory clinic‐based cohort study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021; 2: e87‐ e95. 36098162
  134. [184]Chatterjee P, Pedrini S, Stoops E, et al. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in cognitively normal older adults at risk of Alzheimer's disease. Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11: 27. 33431793 PMC7801513
  135. [185]Chatterjee P, Vermunt L, Gordon BA, et al. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: Associations with Aβ‐PET, neurodegeneration, and cognition. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19: 2790‐ 2804. 36576155 PMC10300233
  136. [186]Jack CR Jr., Wiste HJ, Algeciras‐Schimnich A, et al. Comparison of plasma biomarkers and amyloid PET for predicting memory decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20: 2143‐ 2154. 38265198 PMC10984437
  137. [187]Cicognola C, Janelidze S, Hertze J, et al. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein detects Alzheimer pathology and predicts future conversion to Alzheimer dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021; 13: 68. 33773595 PMC8005231
  138. [188]Suarez‐Calvet M, Araque Caballero MA, Kleinberger G, et al. Early changes in CSF sTREM2 in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease occur after amyloid deposition and neuronal injury. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8: 369ra178. PMC5385711 27974666
  139. [189]Morenas‐Rodriguez E, Li Y, Nuscher B, et al. Soluble TREM2 in CSF and its association with other biomarkers and cognition in autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21: 329‐ 341. 35305339 PMC8926925
  140. [190]Pereira JB, Janelidze S, Strandberg O, et al. Microglial activation protects against accumulation of tau aggregates in nondemented individuals with underlying Alzheimer's disease pathology. Nat Aging. 2022; 2: 1138‐ 1144. 37118533 PMC10154192
  141. [191]Fairfoul G, McGuire LI, Pal S, et al. Alpha‐synuclein RT‐QuIC in the CSF of patients with alpha‐synucleinopathies. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016; 3: 812‐ 818. 27752516 PMC5048391
  142. [192]Shahnawaz M, Tokuda T, Waragai M, et al. Development of a Biochemical Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease by Detection of alpha‐Synuclein Misfolded Aggregates in Cerebrospinal Fluid. JAMA Neurol. 2017; 74: 163‐ 172. 27918765
  143. [193]Arnold MR, Coughlin DG, Brumbach BH, et al. α‐synuclein seed amplification in CSF and brain from patients with different brain distributions of pathological α‐synuclein in the context of co‐pathology and non‐LBD diagnoses. Ann Neurol. 2022; 92: 650‐ 662. 35808984 PMC9489647
  144. [194]Hall S, Orru CD, Serrano GE, et al. Performance of alphaSynuclein RT‐QuIC in relation to neuropathological staging of Lewy body disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022; 10: 90. 35733234 PMC9219141
  145. [195]Palmqvist S, Rossi M, Hall S, et al. Cognitive effects of Lewy body pathology in clinically unimpaired individuals. Nat Med. 2023; 29: 1971‐ 1978. 37464059 PMC10427420
  146. [196]Quadalti C, Palmqvist S, Hall S, et al. Clinical effects of Lewy body pathology in cognitively impaired individuals. Nat Med. 2023; 29: 1964‐ 1970. 37464058 PMC10427416
  147. [197]Rossi M, Candelise N, Baiardi S, et al. Ultrasensitive RT‐QuIC assay with high sensitivity and specificity for Lewy body‐associated synucleinopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 2020; 140: 49‐ 62. 32342188 PMC7299922
  148. [198]Bargar C, De Luca CMG, Devigili G, et al. Discrimination of MSA‐P and MSA‐C by RT‐QuIC analysis of olfactory mucosa: the first assessment of assay reproducibility between two specialized laboratories. Mol Neurodegener. 2021; 16: 82. 34895275 PMC8665327
  149. [199]Seibyl JP. alpha‐synuclein PET and parkinson disease therapeutic trials: ever the twain shall meet? J Nucl Med. 2022; 63: 1463‐ 1466. 35853738
  150. [200]Korat S, Bidesi NSR, Bonanno F, et al. Alpha‐synuclein PET tracer development‐an overview about current efforts. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14: 847. 34577548 PMC8466155
  151. [201]McKeith I, O'Brien J, Walker Z, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6: 305‐ 313. 17362834
  152. [202]Vlaar AM, de Nijs T, Kessels AG, et al. Diagnostic value of 123I‐ioflupane and 123I‐iodobenzamide SPECT scans in 248 patients with parkinsonian syndromes. Eur Neurol. 2008; 59: 258‐ 266. 18264015
  153. [204]Duering M, Biessels GJ, Brodtmann A, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease‐advances since 2013. Lancet Neurol. 2023; 22: 602‐ 618. 37236211
  154. [206]Vemuri P, Graff‐Radford J, Lesnick TG, et al. White matter abnormalities are key components of cerebrovascular disease impacting cognitive decline. Brain Commun. 2021; 3: fcab076. 33937772 PMC8072521
  155. [207]Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Knopman DS, et al. Amyloid, vascular, and resilience pathways associated with cognitive aging. Ann Neurol. 2019; 86: 866‐ 877. 31509621 PMC6899909
  156. [209]Beach TG, Sue LI, Scott S, et al. Cerebral white matter rarefaction has both neurodegenerative and vascular causes and may primarily be a distal axonopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2023; 82: 457‐ 466. 37071794 PMC10209646
  157. [211]Graff‐Radford J, Lesnick T, Rabinstein AA, et al. Cerebral microbleed incidence, relationship to amyloid burden: the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Neurology. 2020; 94: e190‐ e199. 31801832 PMC6988987
  158. [212]Koemans EA, Chhatwal JP, van Veluw SJ, et al. Progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a pathophysiological framework. Lancet Neurol. 2023; 22: 632‐ 642. 37236210
  159. [214]Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain. 2019; 142: 1503‐ 1527. 31039256 PMC6536849
  160. [215]Nelson PT, Head E, Schmitt FA, et al. Alzheimer's disease is not “brain aging”: neuropathological, genetic, and epidemiological human studies. Acta Neuropathol. 2011; 121: 571‐ 587. 21516511 PMC3179861
  161. [216]Beach TG, Malek‐Ahmadi M. Alzheimer's disease neuropathological comorbidities are common in the younger‐old. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021; 79: 389‐ 400. 33285640 PMC8034496
  162. [217]Power MC, Mormino E, Soldan A, et al. Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia. Ann Neurol. 2018; 84: 10‐ 22. 29944741 PMC6119518
  163. [218]Spina S, La Joie R, Petersen C, et al. Copathologies in early‐ vs late‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's dement. 2021; 17: e056436.
  164. [219]Robinson JL, Richardson H, Xie SX, et al. The development and convergence of co‐pathologies in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2021; 144: 953‐ 962. 33449993 PMC8041349
  165. [222]Kawas CH, Kim RC, Sonnen JA, Bullain SS, Trieu T, Corrada MM. Multiple pathologies are common and related to dementia in the oldest‐old: the 90+ Study. Neurology. 2015; 85: 535‐ 542. 26180144 PMC4540246
  166. [223]Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Barnes LL, Bennett DA, Schneider JA. Microinfarct pathology, dementia, and cognitive systems. Stroke. 2011; 42: 722‐ 727. 21212395 PMC3042494
  167. [224]Graff‐Radford J, Gunter JL, Jones DT, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics disorders: relationship to Alzheimer biomarkers and cognition. Neurology. 2019; 93: e2237‐ e2246. 31719134 PMC6937493
  168. [225]Duong MT, Das SR, Lyu X, et al. Dissociation of tau pathology and neuronal hypometabolism within the ATN framework of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 1495. 35314672 PMC8938426
  169. [226]Botha H, Mantyh WG, Graff‐Radford J, et al. Tau‐negative amnestic dementia masquerading as Alzheimer disease dementia. Neurology. 2018; 90: e940‐ e946. 29438037 PMC5858947
  170. [227]Botha H, Mantyh WG, Murray ME, et al. FDG‐PET in tau‐negative amnestic dementia resembles that of autopsy‐proven hippocampal sclerosis. Brain. 2018; 141: 1201‐ 1217. 29538658 PMC5889045
  171. [228]Lyu X, Duong MT, Xie L, et al. Tau‐Neurodegeneration mismatch reveals vulnerability and resilience to comorbidities in Alzheimer's continuum. medRxiv. 2023. PMC10984442 38050662
  172. [229]Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer's disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022; 9: 197‐ 210. 35542991
  173. [231]McDade E, Cummings JL, Dhadda S, et al. Lecanemab in patients with early Alzheimer's disease: detailed results on biomarker, cognitive, and clinical effects from the randomized and open‐label extension of the phase 2 proof‐of‐concept study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022; 14: 191. 36544184 PMC9768996
  174. [233]Novak G, Fox N, Clegg S, et al. Changes in brain volume with bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016; 49: 1123‐ 1134. 26639957
  175. [234]Cogswell PM, Barakos JA, Barkhof F, et al. Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities with emerging Alzheimer disease therapeutics: detection and reporting recommendations for clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022; 43: E19‐ E35. 35953274 PMC9451628
  176. [235]Ighodaro ET, Nelson PT, Kukull WA, et al. Challenges and considerations related to studying dementia in Blacks/African Americans. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 60: 1‐ 10. 28731440 PMC5889715
  177. [236]Babulal GM, Quiroz YT, Albensi BC, et al. Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: update and areas of immediate need. Alzheimers Dement. 2019; 15: 292‐ 312. 30555031 PMC6368893
  178. [237]Brewster P, Barnes L, Haan M, et al. Progress and future challenges in aging and diversity research in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. 2019; 15: 995‐ 1003. 30240574 PMC7021489
  179. [238]Howell JC, Watts KD, Parker MW, et al. Race modifies the relationship between cognition and Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017; 9: 88. 29096697 PMC5668981
  180. [239]Deters KD, Napolioni V, Sperling RA, et al. Amyloid PET imaging in self‐identified non‐hispanic black participants of the anti‐amyloid in asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) Study. Neurology. 2021; 96: e1491‐ e1500. 33568538 PMC8032379
  181. [240]Naslavsky MS, Suemoto CK, Brito LA, et al. Global and local ancestry modulate APOE association with Alzheimer's neuropathology and cognitive outcomes in an admixed sample. Mol Psychiatry. 2022; 27: 4800‐ 4808. 36071110 PMC9734036
  182. [242]Evans DA, Bennett DA, Wilson RS, et al. Incidence of Alzheimer disease in a biracial urban community: relation to apolipoprotein E allele status. Arch Neurol. 2003; 60: 185‐ 189. 12580702
  183. [243]Wilkins CH, Windon CC, Dilworth‐Anderson P, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in amyloid PET positivity in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a secondary analysis of the Imaging Dementia‐Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79: 1139‐ 1147. 36190710 PMC9531087
  184. [244]Barnes LL, Leurgans S, Aggarwal NT, et al. Mixed pathology is more likely in black than white decedents with Alzheimer dementia. Neurology. 2015; 85: 528‐ 534. 26180136 PMC4540250
  185. [245]Gottesman RF, Schneider AL, Zhou Y, et al. The ARIC‐PET amyloid imaging study: brain amyloid differences by age, race, sex, and APOE. Neurology. 2016; 87: 473‐ 480. 27371485 PMC4970663
  186. [246]Schindler SE, Karikari TK, Ashton NJ, et al. Effect of race on prediction of brain amyloidosis by plasma abeta42/abeta40, phosphorylated tau, and neurofilament light. Neurology. 2022; 99: e245‐ e257. 35450967 PMC9302933
  187. [247]Weuve J, Barnes LL, Mendes de Leon CF, et al. Cognitive aging in black and white americans: cognition, cognitive decline, and incidence of Alzheimer disease dementia. Epidemiology. 2018; 29: 151‐ 159. 28863046 PMC5718953
  188. [248]Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Alzheimer's disease in African Americans: risk factors and challenges for the future. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33: 580‐ 586. 24711318 PMC4084964
  189. [249]Ramanan VK, Graff‐Radford J, Syrjanen J, et al. Association of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer disease with cognition and medical comorbidities in a biracial cohort. Neurology. 2023; 101: e1402‐ e1411. 37580163 PMC10573134

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jack, C. R., Andrews, J. S., Beach, T. G., Buracchio, T., Dunn, B., Graf, A., Hansson, O., Ho, C., Jagust, W., McDade, E., Molinuevo, J. L., Okonkwo, O. C., Pani, L., Rafii, M. S., Scheltens, P., Siemers, E., Snyder, H. M., Sperling, R., Teunissen, C. E., & Carrillo, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Global Evidence & Outcomes Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Denali Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Department of Global Clinical Development H. Lundbeck A/S Experimental Medicine Copenhagen Denmark
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Acumen Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Alzheimer's Association (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Medical & Scientific Relations Division Alzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA
Corresponding author
Jack, Clifford R.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-27
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
5143-5169
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4400089962
Cited by
2,803
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1361 · 2025: 1233 · 2024: 208
FWCI
823.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • GHR Foundation
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  • Biogen
  • Eisai
  • Fujirebio Europe
  • GE Healthcare
  • Roche
  • National Institute on Aging
  • BrightFocus Foundation
  • Novo Nordisk
  • UCB
  • National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • Alzheimer Nederland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, United States, Biomarkers, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, National Institute on Aging (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review