Cited by 126Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Disorders of Frontal Lobe Functioning

Alexander, Michael P., Stuss, Donald T.·2000·Seminars in Neurology

Abstract

The neurology of frontal lobe disorders can be summarized in descriptions of behavioral problems (apathy, etc.), of cognitive impairments (poor planning, etc.), and of motor deficits (grasp reflex, etc.). Reviews of this sort do not indicate, however, any regional specificity to the deficit profiles or identify any of the component processes of the complex deficits-what exactly is "poor planning"? In this review we present specific steps that assist in overcoming the limitations: (1) identify weaknesses in current understanding, (2) operationally define the processes to be analyzed, (3) review some methodologies that allow parsing of discreet processes into specific frontal regions, (4) review the unique advantages and disadvantages of the various neurological disorders that provide us with subjects for study, and (5) propose approaches to advance further a useful clinical neurology of frontal lobe disorders as well as a more finely grained scientific description of core frontal processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2000-13175

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive function processes are inter-related and can be conceptualized as an integrated supervisory or control system.

    “while executive function may comprise several distinct processes, they are inter-related and could still be conceptualized, and referred to, as an integrated supervisory or control system”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Alexander & Stuss, 2000

  • Damage at any level of prefrontal networks could potentially result in impairments commonly associated with executive dysfunction.

    “damage at any level of these prefrontal networks could potentially result in impairments commonly associated with executive dysfunction”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Alexander & Stuss, 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, M. P., & Stuss, D. T.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Seminars in Neurology
Published
2000
Volume
20
Issue
04
Pages
427-438
ISSN
  • 0271-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9021
OpenAlex
W2055406377
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
frontal lobe disorders, frontal lobe dysfunction, apathy, cognitive impairment, grasp reflex, motor impairment, behavioral problems
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavioral Symptoms, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Consciousness Disorders, Dementia, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Memory Disorders, Movement Disorders, Neoplasms, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review