The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fatty Liver in Liver Transplantation and Surgery
Abstract
Steatosis of the liver is common in Western countries, affecting about 25% of donors for liver transplantation and 20% of patients undergoing liver resection. Transplantation of livers with severe steatosis (> 60%) is associated with a high risk of primary nonfunction, and these livers should not be used for organ donation. In contrast, transplantation with livers containing mild steatosis (< 30%) yields results similar to those of transplantation performed with nonfatty livers. The outcome of livers with moderate steatosis (30 to 60%) are varying, and the use of these organs depends on the existence of additional risk factors. Similarly, liver resection in patients with steatosis is associated with a risk of postoperative mortality when compared with patients with nonfatty livers (14% versus 2%). Although hepatic steatosis is an important risk factor for surgery, little is known about the mechanisms of injury. In animal experiments, steatosis is associated with decreased ATP production and a disturbance of sinusoidal flow. Further contributing factors may include Kupffer cell dysfunction and leukocyte adhesion. Fatty hepatocytes have reduced tolerance against ischemic injury with a predominant necrotic form of cell death. In addition, the ability of hepatocytes to regenerate after major tissue loss is impaired in the steatotic liver. Very few protective strategies are known. Ischemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping protect the human liver against prolonged periods of ischemia. These techniques appear to be particularly protective in the steatotic liver. New insights into the mechanisms of liver failure in steatotic organs are needed to decrease the risk of surgery and increase the pool of organ donors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection
Kooby, D. A., Fong, Y., Suriawinata, A., Gonen, M., Allen, P. J., Klimstra, D. S., DeMatteo, R. P., D'Angelica, M., Blumgart, L. H., & Jarnagin, W. R. (2003) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.012 · Cited by 431
Limanond, P., Raman, S. S., Lassman, C., Sayre, J., Ghobrial, R. M., Busuttil, R. W., Saab, S., & Lu, D. S. K. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2301021176 · Cited by 366
Liver transplantation using fatty livers: Always feasible?
McCormack, L., Dutkowski, P., El-Badry, A. M., & Clavien, P.-A. (2011) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.004 · Cited by 281
Self-citationSystematic review and meta-analysis of steatosis as a risk factor in major hepatic resection
de Meijer, V. E., Kalish, B. T., Puder, M., & IJzermans, J. N. M. (2010) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.7194 · Cited by 277
Clinical translation of nitrite therapy for cardiovascular diseases
Calvert, J. W., & Lefer, D. J. (2010) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/j.niox.2009.11.001 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Selzner, M., & Clavien, P.-A.
- Venue
- Seminars in Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 105-114
- ISSN
- 0272-8087 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-8971
- OpenAlex
- W1978270167
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fatty Liver in Liver Transplantation and Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2001-12933
- The paper
- Selzner, M., & Clavien, P.-A. (2001). Fatty Liver in Liver Transplantation and Surgery. Seminars in Liver Disease. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.