The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapieziele in der Psychologischen Medizin - Stand der Forschung und Entwicklung eines standardisierten Instruments
Abstract
Therapieziele spielen in allen Bereichen der psychologischen Medizin (Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik) unbestritten eine wichtige Rolle aus der Perspektive von Patienten und von Therapeuten. Demgegenüber steht ein außerordentlicher Mangel an empirischen Untersuchungen insbesondere im Bereich der Psychiatrie. Ausgehend von der Charakterisierung des Konstruktes Therapieziele als sekundäres psychologisches Konstrukt wird der Stand der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zusammenfassend dargestellt. Demnach werden Therapieziele in vielfältigen funktionellen Zusammenhängen mit anderen Therapiemerkmalen diskutiert. Ebenso vielfältige und oftmals schulenspezifische Kategorisierungen erschweren allerdings die Integration der Konzepte und den Vergleich empirischer Befunde. Besonders erwähnt werden daher erste schulenübergreifende Befunde aus der Perspektive von Patienten und Therapeuten. Die Vor- und Nachteile der individuellen Therapiezielerfassung gegenüber dem standardisierten Vorgehen werden diskutiert und erste empirische Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang von Therapiezielen und -verlauf dargestellt. Abschließend berichten wir über eine Pilotstudie zur standardisierten Erfassung von Therapiezielen stationär behandelter psychiatrischer Patienten mittels eines Fragebogens zu persönlichen Therapiezielen (FRAPT). Therapeutic Goals in Psychological Medicine - State of Research and Development of a Standardised Self-Rating Instrument From the patient’s as well as from the therapist’s point of view goals of therapy undoubtedly play an important role in all fields of psychological medicine (psychiatry, psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine). On the other hand, there is a substantial lack of systematic i. e. empirical studies on this issue. Giving an overview on the available scientific literature we start by characterising therapeutic goals as a secondary psychological construction. Therapeutic goals and their multiple associations and different aspects of psychotherapy are discussed. However, a variety of definitions of therapeutic goals, often influenced by the therapeutic orientation of the authors, make it difficult to integrate concepts and to compare findings. Hence, we focus on those results which were found in relation to general concepts, i. e. beyond specific theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we discuss the pros and cons of individual measures of therapeutic goals compared with standardised self-rating instruments. Finally, we underline the lack of studies on therapeutic goals in the psychiatric sphere and report on some results of our own pilot study on the Personal Goals Questionnaire in psychiatric inpatients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Questionnaire for measuring personal therapy goals (FRAPT) subscales have internal consistencies ranging from α = 0.67 to α = 0.92.
“Internal consistencies of the subscales are ranging from α = 0.67–α = 0.92 (78).”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Where Do We Go From Here? The Goal Perspective in Psychotherapy.
Michalak, J., & Holtforth, M. G. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00048.x · Cited by 135
Berking, M., Holtforth, M. G., Jacobi, C., et al. (2005) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300500091801 · Cited by 33
Baumeister, H., Bauereiss, N., Zarski, A.-C., Braun, L., Buntrock, C., Hoherz, C., Idrees, A. R., Kraft, R., Meyer, P., Nguyen, T. B. D., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.660534 · Cited by 30
“Individual therapy goals will be assessed with 4 selected subscales of the “Fragebogen zur Messung persönlicher Therapieziele” [Questionnaire for measuring personal therapy goals] [FRAPT; 31 items; (78)].”
MethodHoltforth, M. G., Reubi, I., Ruckstuhl, L. E., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0020764004040955 · Cited by 28
Some like it specific: The difference between treatment goals of anxious and depressed patients
Holtforth, M. G., Wyss, T., Schulte, D., Trachsel, M., & Michalak, J. (2009) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1348/147608308x397040 · Cited by 28
Holtforth, M. G., & Michalak, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0025 · Cited by 22
Dirmaier, J., Harfst, T., Koch, U., & Schulz, H. (2006) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.470 · Cited by 21
Patientenziele in der Psychotherapie
Michalak, J., Holtforth, M. G., & Berking, M. (2006) · Psychotherapeut · doi:10.1007/s00278-006-0518-6 · Cited by 24
Watzke, B., Schulz, H., & Dirmaier, J. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1661-4747/a000188 · Cited by 4
Fischer, L., Fegert, J., Kölch, M., Kleinrahm, R., & Spröber, N. (2012) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1628255 · Cited by 2
Goals in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Farin‐Glattacker, E., Frey, C., Glattacker, M., & Jäckel, W. H. (2007) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/01.hcr.0000270684.96689.77 · Cited by 4
Sinnvolle Werte und Lebensziele entwickeln
Kossak, H.-C. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13760-0_13 · Cited by 4
Erşahin, Z. (2016) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 2
Sinnvolle Werte und Lebensziele entwickeln
Kossak, H.-C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71622-8_12 · Cited by 2
Dewitz, J., Barthel, D., Dumke, L., Zindler, A., Kriston, L., & Schumacher, L. (2025) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2571252 · Cited by 1
Sinnvolle Werte und Lebensziele entwickeln
Kossak, H.-C. (2022) · Psychotherapie: Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63821-7_19 · Cited by 1
Sinnvolle Werte und Lebensziele entwickeln
Kossak, H.-C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53471-7_14
Therapieziele in der psychosomatischen Rehabiliation
Berking, M. (2004) · doi:10.53846/goediss-3407
Metadata
- Authors
- Driessen, M., Sommer, B., Röstel, C., Malchow, C. P., Rumpf, H.-J., & Adam, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Venue
- PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 239-245
- ISSN
- 0937-2032 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-1058
- OpenAlex
- W2029751396
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- psychological medicine, psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine, patient perspectives, therapist perspectives, therapeutic process, treatment outcomes, psychiatric inpatients, psychotherapy outcome assessment
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychotherapy, Research, Self-Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review