Cited by 11Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Glucose effectiveness: Measurement in diabetic and nondiabetic humans

Basu, A., Rizza, R.·2001·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

It is well established that under the conditions of daily living, insulin secretion and insulin action determine glucose tolerance in nondiabetic humans both in the post-absorptive and post-prandial states. However, in recent years, glucose effectiveness (i.e., the ability of glucose per se to stimulate its own uptake and to suppress its own release) has also been shown to influence glucose tolerance in both diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. In states of deficient insulin action, e.g., in individuals with type 2 diabetes, glucose effectiveness assumes a greater role in determining glucose tolerance both during fasting and post-prandial conditions. A mathematical model (Minimal Model) of glucose turnover has been applied to estimate glucose effectiveness in both diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. Several investigators have demonstrated reduced glucose effectiveness in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, measurements of glucose effectiveness by the traditional single compartment minimal model approach have been fraught with errors when compared to model independent estimates, especially in the diabetic population. This has led investigators to modify the parameters of the model with the incorporation of glucose tracers and the use of two-compartment model of glucose kinetics. Although this has made the indices of glucose effectiveness more robust, proper validation experiments are necessary before widespread application of these methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2001-18578

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basu, A., & Rizza, R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2001-11-23
Volume
109
Issue
Suppl 2
Pages
S157-S165
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W2000485847
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
glucose effectiveness, glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, insulin action, insulin secretion, glucose turnover, minimal models, glucose tracer, postprandial blood glucose, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Models, Biological, Reference Values, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review