Cited by 7Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerMuscle Physiology and DisordersAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Absence of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Expression Does Not Alter GLUT1 or GLUT4 Abundance or Contraction-Stimulated Glucose Uptake by Mouse Skeletal Muscle

Dumke, C. L., Wetter, A. C., Arias, E. B., Kahn, C. R., Cartee, G. D.·2001·Hormone and Metabolic Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) expression on GLUT1 and GLUT4 glucose transporter protein abundance, contraction-stimulated glucose uptake, and contraction-induced glycogen depletion by skeletal muscle. Mice (6 months old) from three genotypes were studied: wild-type (IRS-1(+/+)), heterozygous (IRS-1(+/-)) for the null allele, and IRS-1 knockouts (IRS-1(-/-)) lacking a functional IRS-1 gene. In situ muscle contraction was induced (electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve) in one hindlimb using contralateral muscles as controls. Soleus and extensor digitorum longus were dissected and 2-deoxyglucose uptake was measured in vitro. 2-Deoxyglucose uptake was higher in basal muscles (no contractions) from IRS-1(-/-) vs. both other genotypes. Contraction-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake and glycogen depletion did not differ among genotypes. Muscle IRS-1 protein was undetectable for IRS-1(-/-) mice, and values were approximately 40 % lower in IRS-1(+/-) than in IRS-1(+/+) mice. No difference was found in IRS-1(+/+) compared to IRS-1(-/-) groups regarding muscle abundance of GLUT1 and GLUT4. Substantial reduction or elimination of IRS-1 did not alter the hallmark effects of contractions on muscle carbohydrate metabolism--activation of glucose uptake and glycogen depletion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2001-19141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knockout of IRS1 and Akt2 does not affect contraction-mediated glucose uptake.

    “2) Knockout of the predominant insulin signaling proteins IRS1 and Akt2 does not affect contraction-mediated glucose uptake [107,108].”

    From AMPK and Exercise: Glucose Uptake and Insulin Sensitivity (2013) · cites this paper as [107]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumke, C. L., Wetter, A. C., Arias, E. B., Kahn, C. R., & Cartee, G. D.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Hormone and Metabolic Research
Published
2001-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
696-700
ISSN
  • 0018-5043 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-4286
OpenAlex
W2036370991
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormone and Metabolic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 10026)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 33201, R01DK033201)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
IRS-1, GLUT1, GLUT4, glucose transporters, skeletal muscle, glycogen depletion, insulin signaling, soleus muscle, extensor digitorum longus
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Deoxyglucose, Electric Stimulation, Female, Glycogen, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Monosaccharide Transport Proteins, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Proteins, Organ Size, Phosphoproteins, Sciatic Nerve, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Glucose Transporter Type 4, Mice, Insulin Receptor Substrate Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review