The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Narrow-Band Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Mucosal Lesions: A Pilot Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A newly developed narrow-band imaging (NBI) technique, in which modified optical filters were used in the light source of a video endoscope system, was applied during colonoscopy in a clinical setting. This pilot study evaluated the clinical feasibility of the NBI system for evaluating colorectal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 colorectal lesions in 34 patients were included in the study. The quality of visualization of colorectal lesions and the accuracy of differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions using the NBI system were evaluated in comparison with results from conventional colonoscopy and with chromoendoscopy. RESULTS: For pit pattern delineation, NBI was superior to conventional endoscopy (P < 0.001), but inferior to chromoendoscopy (P < 0.05). NBI achieved better visualization of the mucosal vascular network and of the hue of lesions than conventional endoscopy (P < 0.05). However there was no significant difference between NBI and chromoendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions (both techniques had a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity 75 %). This was better than the results of conventional colonoscopy (sensitivity 83 %, specificity 44 %; P < 0.05 for specificity). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in the examination of colonic lesions the NBI system provides imaging features additional to those of both conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. For distinguishing neoplasms from non-neoplastic lesions, NBI was equivalent to chromoendoscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Muto, M., Minashi, K., Yano, T., Saito, Y., Oda, I., Nonaka, S., Omori, T., Sugiura, H., Goda, K., Kaise, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.4680 · Cited by 699
Self-citationRex, D. K., & Helbig, C. C. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.029 · Cited by 386
Accuracy for Optical Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps in Nonacademic Settings
Kuiper, T., Marsman, W. A., Jansen, J. M., van Soest, E. J., Haan, Y. C. L., Bakker, G. J., Fockens, P., & Dekker, E. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.004 · Cited by 110
Nakai, K., Lin, H., Yamano, S., Tanaka, S., Kitamoto, S., Saitoh, H., Sakuma, K., Kurauchi, J., Akter, E., Konno, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42774-6 · Cited by 14
Bernhofer, S., Prosenz, J., Duller, C., Venturi, D., & Maieron, A. (2026) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003558 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Machida, H., Sano, Y., Hamamoto, Y., Muto, M., Kozu, T., Tajiri, H., & Yoshida, S.
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1094-1098
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W1973980483
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narrow-Band Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Mucosal Lesions: A Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2004-826040
- The paper
- Machida, H., Sano, Y., Hamamoto, Y., Muto, M., Kozu, T., Tajiri, H., & Yoshida, S. (2004). Narrow-Band Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Mucosal Lesions: A Pilot Study. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-826040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.