Cited by 25Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Direkte kosten akutpsychiatrischer tagesklinischer behandlung: ergebnisse aus einer randomisierten kontrollierten studie.

Kallert, Thomas W., Schönherr, Ralf, Schnippa, Susann, Matthes, Christiane, Glöckner, Matthias, Schützwohl, Matthias·2005·Psychiatrische Praxis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: So far only five randomized controlled trials on acute day hospital care have assessed direct health care costs and compared these with costs of conventional inpatient treatment. This paper aims to close this research gap for German speaking countries. METHOD: Another trial was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Dresden University of Technology. Using the Client Service Receipt Inventory interviews with patients at three time-points (admission, discharge, three months after discharge) assessed their utilization of health care services. Based on the results of a separate regional cost-calculation project, costs of individual care packages could be calculated. 144 patients (day care: n = 75, inpatient care: n = 69) with complete data sets for all time-points of assessment were included in the intention-to-treat-analysis. Means of direct costs (given in Euro and referred to Deutsche Mark prices in 2000) were computed, and t-tests and bootstrap-procedures were used for group comparison. Furthermore, missing and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Patients in the acute day hospital caused mean direct health care costs of 12 401 per person within the entire period assessed. Thus, their cost level falls below the mean costs of inpatient care (15,924 euro per person) by 22.1 %. Missing analyses showed no selection effects on cost results caused by patients who could not be assessed at all defined time-points. Costs for inpatient and day care services were the most sensitive parameters for maintaining the statistically significant differences of cost means demonstrated between the two study groups. CONCLUSION: For German-speaking countries, this study shows for the first time that acute day care -- which has been demonstrated to be clinically at least as effective as inpatient care - is the less expensive option if these two settings are comparatively assessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2004-834712

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kallert, T. W., Schönherr, R., Schnippa, S., Matthes, C., Glöckner, M., & Schützwohl, M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Venue
Psychiatrische Praxis
Published
2005-04
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
132-141
ISSN
  • 0303-4259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0876
OpenAlex
W2398724536
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatrische Praxis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychiatric inpatient care, direct medical costs, cost comparison, health care utilization, acute psychiatric inpatients, German-speaking countries
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Mental Disorders, Costs and Cost Analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Day Care, Medical, Health Expenditures, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Formaldehyde, Hospitals, University, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Mental Health Services, National Health Programs, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Schizophrenia, Utilization Review, Health Care Costs, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review