The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Malignant Pancreatic Lesions
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy, safety, and clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreatic masses. METHODS: Forty-seven patients were referred for EUS with a pancreatic mass and suspicion of pancreatic cancer based upon painless obstructive jaundice, epigastric abdominal pain plus weight loss/anorexia, or idiopathic pancreatitis. All patients underwent EUS with both radial (Olympus UM20) and linear array (Pentax FG32-UA) systems. After TNM staging by EUS, ultrasound directed FNA of the pancreatic mass was performed using a 23 gauge, 4 cm long needle. RESULTS: EUS-guided FNA was performed in all 47 patients. Results: successful targeting = 100%, adequate cellularity = 100%, FINDINGS: adeno Ca = 25, squamous cell Ca = 1, lymphoma = 1, poorly differentiated Ca= 1, atypical cytology or suspicious for carcinoma = 9, no malignant cells = 10. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EUS-guided pancreatic FNA for the diagnosis of malignancy was 64%, 100%, 100% and 16% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS with FNA is useful for detection of malignancy in a pancreatic mass. The procedure appears to have a complication rate of 2%. Impact of this technique on clinical management of patients needs further evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review
Lee, E. S. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864 · Cited by 401
Eloubeidi, M. A., Jhala, D., Chhieng, D. C., Chen, V. K., Eltoum, I., Vickers, S., Mel Wilcox, C., & Jhala, N. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11643 · Cited by 332
The role of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer screening
Bhutani, M., Koduru, P., Joshi, V., Saxena, P., Suzuki, R., Irisawa, A., & Yamao, K. (2016) · Endoscopic Ultrasound · doi:10.4103/2303-9027.175876 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhutani, M. S., Hawes, R. H., Baron, P. L., Sanders-Cliette, A., van Velse, A., Osborne, J. F., & Hoffman, B. J.
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 854-858
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W2037734487
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Malignant Pancreatic Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2007-1004321
- The paper
- Bhutani, M. S., Hawes, R. H., Baron, P. L., Sanders-Cliette, A., van Velse, A., Osborne, J. F., & Hoffman, B. J. (1997). Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Malignant Pancreatic Lesions. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1004321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.