Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rehydration after Exercise with Common Beverages and Water

González-Alonso, J., Heaps, C., Coyle, E.·1992·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of two common rehydration beverages (a caffeinated diet cola (DC) and a 6% carbohydrate-electrolyte (CE) solution) compared with water (W) for whole body rehydration, gastric emptying and blood volume (BV) restoration during a 2 h rehydration period following exercise-induced dehydration. Subjects (mean V̇O 2 max = 4.2±0.6 1 · min -1 min -1 ; n = 19) exercised at 60-80% V̇O 2 max in the heat (32 °C; 40% rh) until ˜ 2.5% (1.95±0.12 kg) of their body weight (BW) was lost. After exercise, the subjects sat for 2 h in a thermoneutral environment (21 °C; 60% rh) and drank a volume of DC, W and CE equal to the fluid lost. Fluids were consumed in two boluses averaging 1,046±198 and 912±186 ml at 0 and 45 min of the 2 h rehydration period, respectively. At the end of the rehydration period, no fluid remained in the stomach during any of the trials as indicated by epigastric impedance. However, in all the trials the subjects were somewhat hypohydrated (range 0.6-0.9 kg BW below euhydrated BW; p < 0.05) after the 2 h rehydration period since additional water and BW were lost as a result of urine formation, respiration, sweat and metabolism. The percentage of body weight loss that was regained (used as an index of % rehydration) during DC (54±5%) was significantly lower than that of W and CE (64±5% and 69±5%, respectively; p < 0.05; n = 10). Additionally, the percent rehydration during W was significantly lower than that of CE (65±3% vs 73±3%, respectively; p < 0.05; n = 19). The lower whole body rehydration observed with DC compared with CE and W compared with CE was due mostly to greater urine formation (710±102 vs. 483±91 ml, p < 0.05, n = 10; and 505±61 vs. 339±61 ml, p < 0.05, n = 19, respectively). The decline in blood volume as a result of exercise was not restored during the rehydration period by ingesting DC and W, whereas blood volume was fully restored with CE ingestion (p < 0.05). The ingestion of DC is less effective than water for whole body rehydration, whereas ingestion of CE is somewhat more effective than both W and DC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2007-1021288

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
González-Alonso, J., Heaps, C., & Coyle, E.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
1992-07
Volume
13
Issue
05
Pages
399-406
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2092204379
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rehydration after Exercise with Common Beverages and Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2007-1021288
The paper
González-Alonso, J., Heaps, C., & Coyle, E. (1992). Rehydration after Exercise with Common Beverages and Water. International Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021288

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.