Cited by 331Thermoregulation and physiological responsesExercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-exercise rehydration in man: effects of volume consumed and drink sodium content

SHIRREFFS, SUSAN M., TAYLOR, ANDY J., LEIPER, JOHN B., MAUGHAN, RONALD J.·1996·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

The interaction between the volume and composition of fluids ingested was investigated in terms of rehydration effectiveness. Twelve male volunteers, dehydrated by 2.06 +/- 0.02% (mean +/- SE) of body mass by intermittent cycle exercise, consumed a different drink volume on four separate weeks; six subjects received drink L (23 mmol.l-1 Na+) in each trial and six were given drink H (61 mmol.l-1 Na+). Volumes consumed were equivalent to 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of body mass loss (trials A, B, C, and D, respectively). Blood and urine samples were obtained before exercise and for 7.5 h after exercise. Less urine was excreted following rehydration in trial A than in all other trials. Cumulative urine output (median ml) was less in trial B (493, range 181-731) than D (1361, range 1014-1984), which was not different from trial C (867, range 263-1191) in group L. In group H, the volume excreted in trial B (260, range 137-376) was less than trials C (602, range 350-994) and D (1001, range 714-1425), and the volume in trial C was less than in trial D. These results suggest that both sodium concentration and fluid volume consumed interact to affect the rehydration process. A drink volume greater than sweat loss during exercise must be ingested to restore fluid balance, but unless the sodium content of the beverage is sufficiently high this will merely result in an increased urinary output.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199610000-00009

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Engel, 1984, Am J Physiol, 246, E202
  2. Geelen, 1984, Am J Physiol, 247, R968
  3. Nielsen, 1981, Scand J Sports Sci, 3, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
SHIRREFFS, S. M., TAYLOR, A. J., LEIPER, J. B., & MAUGHAN, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1996-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1260-1271
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086622231
Cited by
331
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
post-exercise rehydration, dehydration, sweat loss, urine output, fluid balance, electrolyte replacement
MeSH terms
Adult, Beverages, Chlorides, Dehydration, Fluid Therapy, Hormones, Humans, Male, Potassium, Sodium, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review