Cited by 19Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Z-Transformed EEG Power Spectra of Children with Down Syndrome vs a Control Group

Schmid, R., Sadowsky, K., Weinmann, H., Tirsch, W., Pöppl, S.·1985·Neuropediatrics

Abstract

Standardized EEG records of eighty-eight children with Down syndrome aged between six months and five years were analysed. The EEGs were digitalized, evaluated by spectral analysis, and subjected to z-transformation, a method which allows a direct comparison of the Down syndrome children with a normal control group (Munich Developmental Longitudinal Study). The results show a significant increase in absolute power, especially theta power; the absolute alpha power is less markedly increased or even decreased. The most significant differences, however, are observed when calculating the relative alpha power. Children with Down syndrome show a reduced relative alpha power already at the age of six months, and this reduction becomes even more prominent with growing age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2008-1059540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with DS as young as 6 months of age show significantly reduced alpha power, implicated in working memory, relative to age-matched controls.

    “For example, children as young as 6 months of age show significantly reduced alpha power, implicated in working memory, relative to age-matched controls138.”
  • In children with DS, oscillatory networks involved in memory consolidation are disrupted within the first postnatal months.

    “Network-level functional analyses of infants and toddlers with DS are scarce, but evidence from early EEG studies suggests that oscillatory networks involved in memory consolidation are disrupted within the first postnatal months in children with DS136–138.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, R., Sadowsky, K., Weinmann, H., Tirsch, W., & Pöppl, S.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Venue
Neuropediatrics
Published
1985-11
Volume
16
Issue
04
Pages
218-224
ISSN
  • 0174-304X (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1899
OpenAlex
W1993061766
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Down syndrome, EEG power spectra, z-transform, theta power, alpha power, absolute power, infants, children
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Infant, Occipital Lobe, Parietal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review