Cited by 12Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersReproductive Health and Technologies

Reproductive toxicity of ovulation induction

Tucker, Kathleen·1996·Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

The development of ovulation-inducing drugs has enabled clinicians to more effectively treat the hypothalamic, pituitary, and ovarian abnormalities resulting in infertility. Pregnancy rates have been improved with the use of agents such as clomiphene citrate (CC), human menopausal gonadotropin [hMG or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) preparations], with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and its analogs, stimulating the development of multiple ovarian follicles and increasing the number of fertilizable oocytes. The use of these drugs is not without certain detrimental or "toxic" consequences. The negative effects from superovulation can occur during follicle development, decreasing the number of healthy oocytes and embryos capable of leading to viable pregnancy. Ovulation induction can lead not only to higher incidences of spontaneous abortions, and multiple and ectopic pregnancies, but also to poor pregnancy rates, due, in part, to asynchrony between embryonic development and the uterine environment. Diseases such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), resulting in the secretion of supraphysiologic levels of estradiol, can lend to severe health complications, possibly requiring hospitalization. Most drugs used for ovulation induction can lead to OHSS. Although incidences of OHSS following CC use are less frequent, CC has been associated with hot flushes, multiple gestations, visual disturbances, cervical mucus abnormalities, and luteal phase deficiency. Finally, there are reports that link any or all of the ovulation-inducing drugs with a higher incidence of ovarian and breast cancer, however, a cause-effect relationship has yet to be proven.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2008-1067979

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tucker, K.
Corresponding author
Tucker, Kathleen
Venue
Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
Published
1996-11
Volume
14
Issue
04
Pages
345-354
ISSN
  • 1526-4564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-8004
OpenAlex
W1963968748
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
ovulation induction, reproductive toxicity, clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone, GnRH agonist, superovulation, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, luteal phase deficiency, ovarian cancer, breast cancer
MeSH terms
Endometrium, Estradiol, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Luteinizing Hormone, Ovulation, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review