Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nurse Clinics and Progressive Ambulatory Patient Care

Lewis, Charles E., Resnik, Barbara A.·1967·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

THE increasing demand for health-care services in the United States has been documented in several studies. The obvious solution, more manpower in all disciplines, is somewhat unrealistic. In all probability, the demand for health services, as presently organized, cannot be met at the rate that current education programs in the health professions can be expanded or replicated.1 There is considerable discussion regarding the delegation of certain aspects of medical care to new types of health professionals as a means of increasing the quantity of services available. Another possibility is to define more adequately the roles of existing disciplines, on the . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm196712072772305

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Lewis, C. E., & Resnik, B. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1967-12-07
Volume
277
Issue
23
Pages
1236-1241
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2086680487
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
47.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurse Clinics and Progressive Ambulatory Patient Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm196712072772305
The paper
Lewis, C. E., & Resnik, B. A. (1967). Nurse Clinics and Progressive Ambulatory Patient Care. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm196712072772305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.