Cited by 60Nursing Roles and PracticesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Task-Shifting From Physicians to Nurses in Primary Care and its Impact on Resource Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Martínez-González, Nahara Anani, Rosemann, Thomas, Djalali, Sima, Huber-Geismann, Flore, Tandjung, Ryan·2015·Medical Care Research and Review

Abstract

Task-shifting from physicians to nurses has gained increasing interest in health policy but little is known about its efficiency. This systematic review was conducted to compare resource utilization with task-shifting from physicians to nurses in primary care. Literature searches yielded 4,589 citations. Twenty studies comprising 13,171 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed nurses had more return consultations and longer consultations than physicians but were similar in their use of referrals, prescriptions, or investigations. The evidence has limitations, but suggests that the effects may be influenced by the utilization of resources, context of care, available guidance, and supervision. Cost data suggest physician–nurse salary and physician’s time spent on supervision and delegation are important components of nurse-led care costs. More rigorous research involving a wider range of nurses from many countries is needed reporting detailed accounts of nurses’ roles and competencies, qualifications, training, resources, time available for consultations, and all-cause costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077558715586297

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic impact of nurse-led primary care remains less documented than its clinical quality.

    “Nevertheless, the economic impact of nurse-led primary care remains less documented than its clinical quality.9,20,23,26,42-44”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-González, N. A., Rosemann, T., Djalali, S., Huber-Geismann, F., & Tandjung, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2015-05-12
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
395-418
ISSN
  • 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6801
OpenAlex
W2171264075
Cited by
60
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care Research and Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Akademie der Naturwissenschaften
  • Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
task shifting, nurse-led care, primary care, resource utilization (health care), consultation time, referral, drug prescribing, health care costs, nursing competencies
MeSH terms
Health Policy, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Delegation, Professional, Practice Patterns, Nurses'

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review