The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner
Abstract
Abstract From July, 1971, to July, 1972, in a large suburban Ontario practice of two family physicians, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effects of substituting nurse practitioners for physicians in primary-care practice. Before and after the trial, the health status of patients who received conventional care from family physicians was compared with the status of those who received care mainly from nurse practitioners. Both groups of patients had a similar mortality experience, and no differences were found in physical functional capacity, social function or emotional function. The quality of care rendered to the two groups seemed similar, as assessed by a quantitative "indicator-condition" approach. Satisfaction was high among both patients and professional personnel. Although cost effective from society's point of view, the new method of primary care was not financially profitable to doctors because of current restrictions on reimbursement for the nurse-practitioner services. (N Engl J Med 290:251–256, 1974)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Spaulding, 1972, Ont Med Rev, 39, 527
- Spitzer, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 1006
- Spitzer, 1973, Ont Med Rev, 40, 96
- Spitzer, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 991
- 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406 · DOI · Paper page
- Sibley, 1973, Clin Research, 21, 726
- 10.1001/jama.206.6.1249 · DOI
- McKee, 1963, Br J Prev Soc Med, 17, 49
- Dawson, 1966, Bull WHO, 34, 533
- 10.2105/AJPH.56.7.1097 · doi:10.2105/ajph.56.7.1097
- 10.1136/bmj.3.5770.334 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92357-9 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92357-9
- 10.1056/NEJM197305312882201 · doi:10.1056/nejm197305312882201
- Silver, 1967, Pediatrics, 39, 756, 10.1542/peds.39.5.756 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1971.03180340052011 · doi:10.1001/jama.1971.03180340052011
- 10.1056/NEJM197004092821505 · doi:10.1056/nejm197004092821505
- 10.2105/AJPH.60.5.870 · doi:10.2105/ajph.60.5.870
- 10.2105/AJPH.62.6.785 · doi:10.2105/ajph.62.6.785
- 10.1056/NEJM196712072772305 · DOI · Paper page
- Ford, 1967, Nurs Outlook, 15, 43
- Day, 1970, Am J Dis Child, 119, 204, 10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100050206003 · doi:10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100050206003
- Chenoy, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 998
- Lees, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 871
- 10.1056/NEJM196903202801206 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197112092852405 · doi:10.1056/nejm197112092852405
- 10.2307/4594809 · doi:10.2307/4594809
Cited by
A methodological framework for assessing health indices
Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · Cited by 1,538
Horrocks, S., Anderson, E., & Salisbury, C. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819 · Cited by 1,235
Primary Care Outcomes in Patients Treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians: A Randomized Trial
Mundinger, M. O., Kane, R. L., Lenz, E. R., Totten, A. M., Tsai, W.-Y., Cleary, P. D., Friedewald, W. T., Siu, A. L., & Shelanski, M. L. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.1.59 · Cited by 955
The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public
Sackett, D. L., & Torrance, G. W. (1978) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(78)90072-3 · Cited by 668
Self-citationA framework for the introduction and evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles
Bryant‐Lukosius, D., & DiCenso, A. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03235.x · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Spitzer, W. O., Sackett, D. L., Sibley, J. C., Roberts, R. S., Gent, M., Kergin, D. J., Hackett, B. C., Olynich, A., Hay, W. I., Lefroy, G., Sweeny, G., Vandervlist, I., Nielsen, H. S., MacKrell, E. V., Prowse, N., Brame, A., Fedor, E., & Wright, K.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1974-01-31
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 251-256
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2016005821
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 214.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197401312900506
- The paper
- Spitzer, W. O., Sackett, D. L., Sibley, J. C., Roberts, R. S., Gent, M., Kergin, D. J., Hackett, B. C., Olynich, A., Hay, W. I., Lefroy, G., Sweeny, G., Vandervlist, I., Nielsen, H. S., MacKrell, E. V., Prowse, N., Brame, A., Fedor, E., & Wright, K. (1974). The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197401312900506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.