Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner

Spitzer, Walter O., Sackett, David L., Sibley, John C., Roberts, Robin S., Gent, Michael, Kergin, Dorothy J., Hackett, Brenda C., Olynich, Anthony, Hay, W. I., Lefroy, G., Sweeny, G., Vandervlist, I., Nielsen, H.S., MacKrell, E. V., Prowse, N., Brame, A., Fedor, E., Wright, K.·1974·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract From July, 1971, to July, 1972, in a large suburban Ontario practice of two family physicians, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effects of substituting nurse practitioners for physicians in primary-care practice. Before and after the trial, the health status of patients who received conventional care from family physicians was compared with the status of those who received care mainly from nurse practitioners. Both groups of patients had a similar mortality experience, and no differences were found in physical functional capacity, social function or emotional function. The quality of care rendered to the two groups seemed similar, as assessed by a quantitative "indicator-condition" approach. Satisfaction was high among both patients and professional personnel. Although cost effective from society's point of view, the new method of primary care was not financially profitable to doctors because of current restrictions on reimbursement for the nurse-practitioner services. (N Engl J Med 290:251–256, 1974)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197401312900506

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Spaulding, 1972, Ont Med Rev, 39, 527
  2. Spitzer, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 1006
  3. Spitzer, 1973, Ont Med Rev, 40, 96
  4. Spitzer, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 991
  5. 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sibley, 1973, Clin Research, 21, 726
  7. 10.1001/jama.206.6.1249 · DOI
  8. McKee, 1963, Br J Prev Soc Med, 17, 49
  9. Dawson, 1966, Bull WHO, 34, 533
  10. 10.2105/AJPH.56.7.1097 · doi:10.2105/ajph.56.7.1097
  11. 10.1136/bmj.3.5770.334 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92357-9 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92357-9
  13. 10.1056/NEJM197305312882201 · doi:10.1056/nejm197305312882201
  14. Silver, 1967, Pediatrics, 39, 756, 10.1542/peds.39.5.756 · DOI
  15. 10.1001/jama.1971.03180340052011 · doi:10.1001/jama.1971.03180340052011
  16. 10.1056/NEJM197004092821505 · doi:10.1056/nejm197004092821505
  17. 10.2105/AJPH.60.5.870 · doi:10.2105/ajph.60.5.870
  18. 10.2105/AJPH.62.6.785 · doi:10.2105/ajph.62.6.785
  19. 10.1056/NEJM196712072772305 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ford, 1967, Nurs Outlook, 15, 43
  21. Day, 1970, Am J Dis Child, 119, 204, 10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100050206003 · doi:10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100050206003
  22. Chenoy, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 998
  23. Lees, 1973, Can Med Assoc J, 108, 871
  24. 10.1056/NEJM196903202801206 · DOI
  25. 10.1056/NEJM197112092852405 · doi:10.1056/nejm197112092852405
  26. 10.2307/4594809 · doi:10.2307/4594809

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Spitzer, W. O., Sackett, D. L., Sibley, J. C., Roberts, R. S., Gent, M., Kergin, D. J., Hackett, B. C., Olynich, A., Hay, W. I., Lefroy, G., Sweeny, G., Vandervlist, I., Nielsen, H. S., MacKrell, E. V., Prowse, N., Brame, A., Fedor, E., & Wright, K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1974-01-31
Volume
290
Issue
5
Pages
251-256
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2016005821
Cited by
432
References
0
FWCI
214.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197401312900506
The paper
Spitzer, W. O., Sackett, D. L., Sibley, J. C., Roberts, R. S., Gent, M., Kergin, D. J., Hackett, B. C., Olynich, A., Hay, W. I., Lefroy, G., Sweeny, G., Vandervlist, I., Nielsen, H. S., MacKrell, E. V., Prowse, N., Brame, A., Fedor, E., & Wright, K. (1974). The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197401312900506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.