Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 681

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Methotrexate: Distribution in Cerebrospinal Fluid after Intravenous, Ventricular and Lumbar Injections

Shapiro, William R., Young, Dean F., Mehta, Bipin M.·1975·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The kinetics and distribution of methotrexate in intraventricular and intrathecal cerebrospinal-fluid spaces were studied in patients with meningeal leukemia and meningeal carcinomatosis after drug administration by intravenous infusion, indwelling intraventricular subcutaneous reservoir (Ommaya), or standard lumbar puncture. Negligible ventricular concentrations followed a single intravenous dose. During an intravenous infusion (500 mg per square meter for 24 hours) the ventricular cerebrospinal-fluid concentration rose to 6 times 10-minus 7 M. Methotrexate administered by Ommaya reservoir, at a dose of 6.25 mg per square meter, rapidly distributed in the subarachnoid space; the peak ventricular concentration of 2 times 10-minus 4 M declined exponentially over 48 hours. Lumbar cerebrospinal-fluid concentration reached a maximum of 5 times 10-minus 5 M four hours after injection and then fell exponentially. Administration by lumbar puncture occasionally produced epidural and subdural leakage; even with successful lumbar puncture, ventricular methotrexate concentration varied considerably from patient to patient despite similar doses. Administration by Ommaya reservoir more reliably produced adequate cerebrospinal fluid distribution than administration by lumbar puncture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197507242930402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, W. R., Young, D. F., & Mehta, B. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1975-07-24
Volume
293
Issue
4
Pages
161-166
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2342032414
Cited by
681
References
0
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.