The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Autopsy: Its Decline and a Suggestion for Its Revival
Abstract
The hospital autopsy rate in the United States dropped from 41 per cent in 1964 to 22 per cent in 1975. This reduction is attributable to a declining interest for many reasons by clinicians, surgeons, pathologists, families of the deceased and hospital administrators and hospital accreditors. Various advances in medicine and surgery in recent years have not replaced the value of the autopsy; indeed they have increased the potential information to be gained from it. For interest in autopsies to be revived among physicians and surgeons, pathologists must provide more expert information from the autopsy. To provide the type of information sought from autopsies by physicians and surgeons, the training of pathologists must be altered so that there can be more specialization in anatomic pathology and more subspecialization in the various organ systems, as in internal medicine. In addition, the means of communication between anatomic pathologists and clinicians needs altering so that important clinical questions are recognized by pathologists, and the answers sought and promptly, understandably and diplomatically communicated to physicians and surgeons. Moreover, the large body of information obtained in recent years from autopsies alone needs to be better recognized by clinicians so that they may better understand the value of these examinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnostic Error in Medicine: Analysis of 583 Physician-Reported Errors
Schiff, G. D. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333 · Cited by 638
The Autopsy as a Measure of Accuracy of the Death Certificate
Kircher, T., Nelson, J., & Burdo, H. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198511143132005 · Cited by 527
Metastatic Patterns of Cancers: Results From a Large Autopsy Study
diSibio, G., & French, S. W. (2008) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2008-132-931-mpocrf · Cited by 527
Liver cirrhosis with and without mention of alcohol as cause of death
HABERMAN, P. W., & WEINBAUM, D. F. (1990) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb03074.x · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, W. C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1978-08-17
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 332-338
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2000118519
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Autopsy: Its Decline and a Suggestion for Its Revival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197808172990704
- The paper
- Roberts, W. C. (1978). The Autopsy: Its Decline and a Suggestion for Its Revival. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197808172990704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.