Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 541

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered Species

Open access
Wyngaarden, James B.·1979·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

THIS paper deals with the physician-investigator as an endangered species and with the future of clinical research. Clinical research includes the wide range of activities extending from epidemiology to studies of patients, to laboratory studies of specimens and tissues. Clinical research is usually conducted by physician-investigators working in a clinical department of a medical school or in a clinical division of an institute. An increasing number of Ph.D.'s are also engaging in clinical research, but this paper will be largely devoted to the physician-investigator.For several years there has been a declining interest in biomedical research on the part of . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197912063012303

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 541

Metadata

Authors
Wyngaarden, J. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1979-12-06
Volume
301
Issue
23
Pages
1254-1259
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2006010409
Cited by
541
References
0
FWCI
24.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197912063012303
The paper
Wyngaarden, J. B. (1979). The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered Species. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197912063012303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.