The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The physician–scientist workforce in the United States
Open accessAbstract
The lack of research dollars dedicated to understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders is a barrier not only to making significant medical advances for our patients but also to developing the physician–scientist workforce to fuel those advances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Globally there is a continual decline in the physician-scientist workforce that hold the NIH Research Project Grant, with established physician-scientists getting more grants than early career physician-scientists.
“Globally there is a continual decline in the physician-scientist workforce that hold the NIH Research Project Grant, but it follows an aging trend of established physician-scientists getting more NIH Research Project grants than early career physician-scientists [28].”
From The dentist-scientist career pathway in Africa: opportunities and obstacles (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
The passage under “The physician-scientist workforce in the United States” says the US workforce is declining in numbers and NIH RPG holders, and that established physician-scientists compete more effectively for RPGs than early-career scientists. It does not establish a global decline or state that established scientists receive more grants in absolute numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered Species
Wyngaarden, J. Β. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197912063012303 · Cited by 546
The Physician-Scientist Career Pipeline in 2005
Ley, T. J., & Rosenberg, L. E. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.11.1343 · Cited by 361
Clinical Research Perceptions, Reality, and Proposed Solutions
Nathan, D. G. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.16.1427 · Cited by 221
Careers in Clinical Research: Obstacles and Opportunities.
Kelley, W. N. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520250026008 · Cited by 93
The Development of Clinical Research Training: Past History and Current Trends in the United States
Teo, A. R. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31819a81c9 · Cited by 58
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- National Research Council. 1994 The National Academies Press Washington DC
- Association of American Medical Colleges,, 1999, Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Clinical Research: A National Call To Action
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The dentist-scientist career pathway in Africa: opportunities and obstacles
Adeola, H. A., Adefuye, A., Soyele, O., & Butali, A. (2018) · Korean Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.3946/kjme.2018.93 · Cited by 9
“The current capacity of the dentist-scientists workforce in Africa is unknown as compared to an approximate 9,000 physician-scientists declared by the United States in 2012 with NIH research project grants [28].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Deligiannidis, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deligiannidis, K. M.
- ORCID
- Deligiannidis, K. M.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-07
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-318
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- PMC
- PMC4573222
- OpenAlex
- W1927352871
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Grant (5K23MH097794, L30MH104713-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- physician-scientists, research workforce, psychiatric research funding, mental illness, research capacity
- MeSH terms
- Certification, Education, Medical, Health Workforce, Humans, Physicians, Research Personnel, Societies, Scientific, United States, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
