Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Comparisons of Radiotherapy and Nitrosoureas for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma after Surgery

Walker, Michael D., Green, Sylvan B., Byar, David P., Alexander, Eben, Batzdorf, Ulrich, Brooks, William H., Hunt, William E., MacCarty, Collin S., Mahaley, M. Stephen, Mealey, John, Owens, Guy, Ransohoff, Joseph, Robertson, James T., Shapiro, William R., Smith, Kenneth R., Wilson, Charles B., Strike, Thomas A.·1980·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Within three weeks of definitive surgical intervention, 467 patients with histologically proved malignant glioma were randomized to receive one of four treatment regimens: semustine (MeCCNU), radiotherapy, carmustine (BCNU) plus radiotherapy, or semustine plus radiotherapy. We analyzed the data for the total randomized population and for the 358 patients in whom the initial protocol specifications were met (the valid study group). Observed toxicity included acceptable skin reactions secondary to radiotherapy and reversible leukopenia and thrombocytopenia due to chemotherapy. Radiotherapy used alone or in combination with a nitrosourea significantly improved survival in comparison with semustine alone. The group receiving carmustine plus radiotherapy had the best survival, but the difference in survival between the groups receiving carmustine plus radiotherapy and semustine plus radiotherapy was not statistically significant. The combination of carmustine plus radiotherapy produced a modest benefit in long-term (18-month) survival as compared with radiotherapy alone, although the difference between survival curves was not significiant at the 0.05 level. This study suggests that it is best to use radiotherapy in the post-surgical treatment of malignant glioma and to continue the search for an effective chemotherapeutic regimen to use in addition to radiotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198012043032303

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,611

Metadata

Authors
Walker, M. D., Green, S. B., Byar, D. P., Alexander, E., Batzdorf, U., Brooks, W. H., Hunt, W. E., MacCarty, C. S., Mahaley, M. S., Mealey, J., Owens, G., Ransohoff, J., Robertson, J. T., Shapiro, W. R., Smith, K. R., Wilson, C. B., & Strike, T. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1980-12-04
Volume
303
Issue
23
Pages
1323-1329
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2036560693
Cited by
1,611
References
2
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparisons of Radiotherapy and Nitrosoureas for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma after Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198012043032303
The paper
Walker, M. D., Green, S. B., Byar, D. P., Alexander, E., Batzdorf, U., Brooks, W. H., Hunt, W. E., MacCarty, C. S., Mahaley, M. S., Mealey, J., Owens, G., Ransohoff, J., Robertson, J. T., Shapiro, W. R., Smith, K. R., Wilson, C. B., & Strike, T. A. (1980). Randomized Comparisons of Radiotherapy and Nitrosoureas for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma after Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198012043032303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.