The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine
Abstract
Internist-I is an experimental computer program capable of making multiple and complete diagnoses in internal medicine. It differs from most other programs for computer-assisted diagnosis in the generality of its approach and the size and diversity of its knowledge base. To document the strengths and weaknesses of the program we performed a systematic evaluation of the capabilities of INTERNIST-I. Its performance on a series of 19 clinicopathological exercises (Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital) published in the Journal appeared qualitatively similar to that of the hospital clinicians but inferior to that of the case discussants. The evaluation demonstrated that the present form of the program is not sufficiently reliable for clinical applications. Specific deficiencies that must be overcome include the program's inability to reason anatomically or temporally, its inability to construct differential diagnoses spanning multiple areas, its occasional attribution of findings to improper causes, and its inability to explain its "thinking".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Artificial Intelligence
Nilsson, N. J. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09438-9 · Cited by 3,457
Cited by
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 · Cited by 1,640
Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils
Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Rus, D., & Meireles, O. R. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002693 · Cited by 1,468
Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis
(1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-27773-7 · Cited by 1,163
Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence
Shortliffe, E. H., & Sepúlveda, M. J. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17163 · Cited by 920
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, R. A., Pople, H. E., & Myers, J. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1982-08-19
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 468-476
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2074706689
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198208193070803
- The paper
- Miller, R. A., Pople, H. E., & Myers, J. D. (1982). Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198208193070803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.