Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple Sclerosis

McFarlin, Dale E., McFarland, Henry F.·1982·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

(First of Two Parts)The lesions of multiple sclerosis were probably described as early as 1838,1 but it was Charcot in 18682 who recognized the characteristic clinical and pathologic features of the disease. Since that time, the disorder has been studied extensively. Numerous distinguished, even renowned physicians and scientists have investigated various aspects of multiple sclerosis. Although much has been learned and many theories have emerged, the cause and pathogenesis of this disease remains unknown. No preventive measures or definitive therapies exist. The purpose of this article is to review the classic clinical and pathologic aspects of the disease and . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198211043071905

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
McFarlin, D. E., & McFarland, H. F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1982-11-04
Volume
307
Issue
19
Pages
1183-1188
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2413496808
Cited by
416
References
0
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198211043071905
The paper
McFarlin, D. E., & McFarland, H. F. (1982). Multiple Sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198211043071905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.