The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation
Abstract
In a randomized multicenter trial, 209 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants were treated either with cyclosporine and prednisone or with standard therapy that included azathioprine and prednisone. Predicted graft survival at one year was 80.4 per cent in patients receiving cyclosporine and 64.0 per cent in those receiving standard therapy (P = 0.003). Predicted patient survival at one year was 96.6 per cent in patients given cyclosporine and 86.4 per cent in those given standard therapy. A detrimental effect on predicted graft survival at one year was seen in patients treated with cyclosporine if they received kidneys that were perfused by machine for longer than 24 hours (70 vs. 88 per cent, P = 0.005) or if the time used to perform the surgical anastomosis was longer than 45 minutes (60 vs. 89 per cent, P = 0.002). In the group receiving standard therapy, predicted graft survival was better in patients who had had five or more blood transfusions than in those who had had two to four transfusions (77 vs. 55 per cent, P = 0.05). Serum creatinine was 2.6 mg per deciliter in patients receiving cyclosporine 90 days after transplantation and 2.0 mg per deciliter in those receiving standard therapy (P = 0.03). Lymphoma developed in one patient receiving cyclosporine. We conclude that cyclosporine is preferable to azathioprine in preventing renal transplant rejection. Further studies will be required to determine the optimal regimen with this agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calcineurin inhibitors: 40 years later, can’t live without
Azzi, J. R., Sayegh, M. H., & Mallat, S. G. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1390055 · Cited by 337
Myers, P. D. B. D. (1986) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1986.280 · Cited by 325
Nelson, J., Alvey, N., Bowman, L., Schulte, J., Segovia, M. C., McDermott, J., Te, H. S., Kapila, N., Levine, D. J., Gottlieb, R. L., et al. (2022) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2716 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- The Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1983-10-06
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 809-815
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4244697632
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198310063091401
- The paper
- The Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group. (1983). A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198310063091401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.