Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Intracoronary Streptokinase and Intracoronary Nitroglycerin Infusion on Coronary Angiographic Patterns and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rentrop, K. Peter, Feit, Frederick, Blanke, Heinrich, Stecy, Peter, Schneider, Richard, Rey, Mariano, Horowitz, Steven, Goldman, Martin, Karsch, Karl, Meilman, Henry, Cohen, Marc, Siegel, Stephen, Sanger, Joseph, Slater, James, Gorlin, Richard, Fox, Arthur, Fagerstrom, Richard, Calhoun, W. Ford·1984·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We randomly assigned patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction to one of four treatment groups: intracoronary streptokinase, intracoronary nitroglycerin, intracoronary streptokinase and intracoronary nitroglycerin, or conventional therapy without initial angiography. Of 124 patients 122 sustained acute myocardial infarction. Initial angiography revealed total occlusion of the coronary artery responsible for infarction in 67 per cent (61 of 91). Acute recanalization occurred in 74 per cent (32 of 43) of patients receiving streptokinase but in only 6 per cent (1 of 18) of patients treated with nitroglycerin alone (P less than 0.01). At angiography of all four groups on Day 10 to 14 the vessel responsible for acute myocardial infarction was patent in 77 per cent (71 of 92) of patients; there was no difference among groups, indicating gradual, endogenous thrombolysis in patients not treated with streptokinase. Patients with subtotal obstruction initially had significant improvement in left ventricular function, significantly lower peak creatine kinase levels, and a trend toward lower mortality than patients with total occlusion initially. Mortality at six months in patients receiving streptokinase (21 per cent, 13 of 62) did not differ significantly from that in patients not treated with streptokinase (10 per cent, 6 of 61). Additional studies will be necessary to assess treatment effects in the angiographic subsets identified by this trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198412063112301

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Rentrop, K. P., Feit, F., Blanke, H., Stecy, P., Schneider, R., Rey, M., Horowitz, S., Goldman, M., Karsch, K., Meilman, H., Cohen, M., Siegel, S., Sanger, J., Slater, J., Gorlin, R., Fox, A., Fagerstrom, R., & Calhoun, W. F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1984-12-06
Volume
311
Issue
23
Pages
1457-1463
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2017731963
Cited by
283
References
0
FWCI
34.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Intracoronary Streptokinase and Intracoronary Nitroglycerin Infusion on Coronary Angiographic Patterns and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198412063112301
The paper
Rentrop, K. P., Feit, F., Blanke, H., Stecy, P., Schneider, R., Rey, M., Horowitz, S., Goldman, M., Karsch, K., Meilman, H., Cohen, M., Siegel, S., Sanger, J., Slater, J., Gorlin, R., Fox, A., Fagerstrom, R., & Calhoun, W. F. (1984). Effects of Intracoronary Streptokinase and Intracoronary Nitroglycerin Infusion on Coronary Angiographic Patterns and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198412063112301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.