Cited by 172Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchSmoking Behavior and CessationCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Cigarette Smoking and Neoplasia of the Uterine Cervix: Smoke Constituents in Cervical Mucus

Isaac E. Sasson, Nancy J. Haley, D. Hoffmann, Ernst L. Wynder, Dan Hellberg, Staffan Nilsson·1985·New England Journal of Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198501313120516

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasson, I. E., Haley, N. J., Hoffmann, D., Wynder, E. L., Hellberg, D., & Nilsson, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1985-01-31
Volume
312
Issue
5
Pages
315-316
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2396892938
Cited by
172
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
cigarette smoking, cervical neoplasia, cervical cancer, cervical mucus, smoke constituents, tobacco smoke
MeSH terms
Cervix Mucus, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cotinine, Female, Humans, Nicotine, Pyrrolidinones, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review