The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prolongation of the Disease-Free Interval in Surgically Treated Rectal Carcinoma
Abstract
To assess the effects of postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy on tumor recurrence and patient survival, 227 patients (data on 202 of whom were analyzed) who had undergone "curative" surgical resection for rectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively and randomly assigned to one of four treatments: no adjuvant therapy (concurrent controls, 58 patients), postoperative radiotherapy with 4000 or 4800 rad (50 patients), postoperative chemotherapy (fluorouracil and semustine [methyl-CCNU], 48 patients), or a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy (46 patients). Five years after the entry of the last patient and with a median follow-up of all survivors for 80 months, the recurrence rate was highest among the control patients (55 per cent) and lowest among the patients receiving a combination of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy (33 per cent). Time to tumor recurrence differed significantly among the four treatment groups (P less than 0.04); it was significantly prolonged by combined radiation and chemotherapy as compared with resection alone (P less than 0.009). Overall survival did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. The superiority of the combined-modality regimen appeared to be attributable to the effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in controlling local and distant recurrences, respectively. We conclude that this study provides evidence supporting the use of postoperative radiation therapy in conjunction with chemotherapy in patients who have had "curative" resection of rectal cancer with involvement of perirectal fat or regional nodes or both (Stages B2 and C).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Sauer, R., Becker, H., Hohenberger, W., Rödel, C., Wittekind, C., Fietkau, R., Martus, P., Tschmelitsch, J., Hager, E., Hess, C. F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040694 · Cited by 6,050
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
Emami, B., Lyman, J., Brown, A., Cola, L., Goitein, M., Munzenrider, J. E., Shank, B., Solin, L. J., & Wesson, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y · Cited by 4,488
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
MacFarlane, J. K., Ryall, R. D. H., & Heald, R. J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-w · Cited by 1,781
Guillem, J. G., Chessin, D. B., Cohen, A. M., Shia, J., Mazumdar, M., Enker, W., Paty, P. B., Weiser, M. R., Klimstra, D., Saltz, L., et al. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000161980.46459.96 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1985-06-06
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1465-1472
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4253234031
- Cited by
- 1,130
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prolongation of the Disease-Free Interval in Surgically Treated Rectal Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198506063122301
- The paper
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. (1985). Prolongation of the Disease-Free Interval in Surgically Treated Rectal Carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198506063122301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.