Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Visual and Auditory Neurotoxicity in Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Deferoxamine Infusions

Olivieri, Nancy F., Buncic, J. Raymond, Chew, Emily, Gallant, Tsvi, Harrison, Robert V., Keenan, Nancy, Logan, William, Mitchell, David, Ricci, Geri, Skarf, Barry, Taylor, Margot, Freedman, Melvin H.·1986·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Of 89 patients receiving nightly subcutaneous deferoxamine for transfusion-dependent thalassemia major or Diamond-Blackfan anemia, 13 presented with visual loss or deafness of acute onset or both. Detailed ophthalmologic, audiologic, and evoked-potential studies uncovered abnormalities caused by neurotoxicity in 27 more. Four patients with visual loss had optic neuropathy, with a marked decrease in acuity, loss of color vision, and delayed visual evoked potentials. Five asymptomatic patients had changes in the pigment of the retinal epithelium. The hearing loss was characterized by a high-frequency sensorineural deficit, which necessitated hearing aids in six patients. When deferoxamine was stopped, recovery of vision was complete in 2 patients and partial in 2, and in 22 patients with abnormal audiograms, reversal of the hearing deficit was complete in 4 and partial in 1. An analysis of the clinical data showed that members of the affected group were younger, had lower serum ferritin values, and were self-administering higher doses of deferoxamine per kilogram of body weight. Significantly lower doses of deferoxamine were being taken by patients without abnormalities than by those with visual symptoms, abnormal audiograms, or prolonged evoked potentials (P less than 0.001, less than 0.006, and less than 0.04, respectively). The data implicate high-dose deferoxamine as a central factor in the pathogenesis of the neurotoxicity. We strongly recommend careful regulation of the deferoxamine dosage and serial audiovisual monitoring in all patients receiving the drug.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198604033141402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Olivieri, N. F., Buncic, J. R., Chew, E., Gallant, T., Harrison, R. V., Keenan, N., Logan, W., Mitchell, D., Ricci, G., Skarf, B., Taylor, M., & Freedman, M. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1986-04-03
Volume
314
Issue
14
Pages
869-873
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2051260674
Cited by
429
References
0
FWCI
19.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual and Auditory Neurotoxicity in Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Deferoxamine Infusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198604033141402
The paper
Olivieri, N. F., Buncic, J. R., Chew, E., Gallant, T., Harrison, R. V., Keenan, N., Logan, W., Mitchell, D., Ricci, G., Skarf, B., Taylor, M., & Freedman, M. H. (1986). Visual and Auditory Neurotoxicity in Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Deferoxamine Infusions. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198604033141402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.